Receive free UK banks updates
We’ll ship you a myFT Daily Digest e-mail rounding up the newest UK banks information each morning.
The UK’s prime monetary regulator has promised additional work on bank account closures as a fierce backlash erupted over its preliminary evaluation that politicians weren’t being denied entry to providers due to their views.
The Financial Conduct Authority on Tuesday stated that not one of the 34 banks, funds corporations and constructing societies it examined had closed a single account “primarily because of a customer’s political views” within the 12 months to June 2023. Instead, it discovered that dormant accounts and considerations about monetary crime had been the principle causes for closures.
Nigel Farage, the previous Ukip chief whose claims that he was “de-banked” over his political opinions led the federal government to order the FCA probe, stated the discovering was “a complete and utter farce, it is a total whitewash, it is a joke”.
City minister Andrew Griffith famous the “initial report” by the regulator however added “clearly there is more to be done to validate the submissions by banks and to ensure that the FCA have thoroughly followed up de-banked customer perspectives”.
In its prolonged report, the FCA repeatedly harassed that information had been gathered “at speed” and that there have been important gaps. The train solely started in August after Farage ignited a nationwide debate on free speech by claiming he had been ejected from personal bank Coutts due to his political opinions.
Farage revealed a file displaying the bank had stated that persevering with to serve him wouldn’t be “compatible with Coutts” since his views had been “at odds with our position as an inclusive organisation”.
Coutts finally supplied to retain Farage as a shopper and he was nonetheless with the bank by the top of July.
“While no bank, building society or payment firm reported to us that they had closed accounts primarily due to someone’s political views, further work is needed for us to be sure,” stated Nikhil Rathi, the FCA’s chief government, on Tuesday.
That work will start with validating the info the FCA already has and following up with “outliers” which have the next incidence of rejecting purposes or closing sure account sorts than friends.
A specific space of concern is primary bank accounts — that are designed to be sure that everybody has a minimal stage of entry to monetary providers. The FCA discovered that as many as 35.7 per cent of those accounts had been declined and is now asking corporations why the determine is so excessive.
Writing within the Financial Times, Rathi stated the FCA additionally wished to “understand more about what are described as ‘reputational’ factors behind a number of closures”.
“There are banks who have long declined accounts to businesses that conflict with their company’s policies. But reputational criteria should not be stretched too far,” he wrote.
The FCA didn’t give a timeframe for finishing its follow-up work, nor commit to publishing its end result.
“The ball I think is firmly back in the court of the government, Andrew Griffith and Jeremy Hunt, this isn’t good enough . . . We need sackings of the (FCA) board,” Farage stated, referring to the City minister and the chancellor, in feedback on X, previously often called Twitter.
Government insiders say ministers have been pissed off by the velocity with which the FCA initially responded to the de-banking controversy and need the regulator to produce more “granular detail” on the difficulty.
Griffith stated: “Free speech is a fundamental human right. No ifs, no buts — everyone must be able to express their lawful opinions without fear of losing the vital access to a bank account.”
He added: “We have already acted to force banks to explain and delay any decision to close an account to protect freedom of expression — meaning customers will have a 90-day notice period and a clear explanation for any account closure. That will be backed up in legislation this year.”
Sarah Pritchard, the FCA’s government director of markets, advised reporters the regulator had been “very clear that it is unlawful for a customer to lose access to their bank or building society account because of their legally expressed political views”.