- A 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel on Tuesday struck down Maryland’s handgun licensing legislation in a 2-1 ruling.
- The legislation, whose necessities embody fingerprint submissions and completion of a four-hour firearms security course, was deemed unconstitutionally restrictive.
- “The challenged law restricts the ability of law-abiding adult citizens to possess handguns,” the court docket’s opinion learn, “and the state has not presented a historical analogue that justifies its restriction.”
A federal appeals court docket on Tuesday struck down Maryland’s handgun licensing legislation, discovering that its necessities, which embody submitting fingerprints for a background test and taking a four-hour firearms security course, are unconstitutionally restrictive.
In a 2-1 ruling, judges on the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond stated they thought of the case in mild of a U.S. Supreme Court resolution final 12 months that “effected a sea change in Second Amendment law.”
The underlying lawsuit was filed in 2016 as a problem to a Maryland legislation requiring individuals to acquire a particular license earlier than buying a handgun. The legislation, which was handed in 2013 within the aftermath of the mass capturing at Sandy Hook Elementary School, laid out a collection of obligatory steps for would-be gun purchasers: finishing 4 hours of security coaching that features firing one stay spherical, submitting fingerprints and passing a background test, being 21 and residing in Maryland.
MAINE’S ‘YELLOW FLAG’ LAW INVOKED OVER A DOZEN TIMES SINCE LEWISTON SHOOTING SPREE
Maryland Gov. Wes Moore, a Democrat, stated he was disenchanted within the circuit court docket’s ruling and can “continue to fight for this law.” He stated his administration is reviewing the ruling and contemplating its choices.
“Common-sense gun laws are critical to protecting all Marylanders from the gun violence that has terrorized our communities.” Moore stated in a press release Tuesday. “I am determined to do more than just give thoughts and prayers and attend funerals — and that’s why this law is vital to our administration’s commitment to keeping guns out of the wrong hands and saving lives.”
The 4th Circuit opinion by Judge Julius Richardson straight references the Supreme Court resolution final 12 months that discovered Americans have a proper to hold firearms in public for self-defense. That ruling, which additionally got here after a collection of mass shootings, ushered in a serious enlargement of gun rights.
It additionally required gun legal guidelines to fall according to the nation’s “historical tradition of firearm regulation.” In this case, Richardson and Judge G. Steven Agee discovered no proof of such alignment.
“If you live in Maryland and you want a handgun, you must follow a long and winding path to get one,” Richardson wrote within the opinion. “The challenged law restricts the ability of law-abiding adult citizens to possess handguns, and the state has not presented a historical analogue that justifies its restriction.”
The court docket additionally pointed to the timeline for acquiring a handgun qualification license, which might take as much as 30 days.
Even although Maryland’s legislation doesn’t prohibit individuals from “owning handguns at some time in the future, it still prohibits them from owning handguns now,” Richardson wrote. “And the law’s waiting period could well be the critical time in which the applicant expects to face danger.”
But in her dissenting opinion, Judge Barbara Milano Keenan stated her colleagues misapplied the Supreme Court precedent. She condemned their “hyperaggressive view of the Second Amendment.”
Instead of reversing the district court docket ruling that was issued earlier than the 2022 Supreme Court resolution, Keenan argued, the case ought to as an alternative have been remanded to the decrease court docket for reconsideration as a result of “there is no legitimate reason to short-circuit the judicial process.”
Agee and Richardson have been appointed by Republican presidents, whereas Keenan was appointed by a Democrat.
SUPREME COURT APPEARS LIKELY TO HAND BIDEN DOJ A WIN ON CHALLENGE TO GUN LAW
The Supreme Court’s 2022 ruling — its first main gun resolution in additional than a decade — was equally break up, with the court docket’s conservatives within the majority and liberals in dissent.
Mark Pennak, president of the advocacy group Maryland Shall Issue, which introduced the lawsuit difficult the state licensing requirement, stated he’s happy with Tuesday’s ruling. He stated it removes an pointless tangle of crimson tape.
“It’s a big win for common sense and the rule of law,” he stated.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Pennak stated the 2013 legislation made acquiring a handgun a very costly and arduous course of. Before that legislation handed, he stated, individuals needed to full a extra restricted coaching and cross a background test, amongst different necessities.