What's Hot

    A attainable SiriusXM-iHeartMedia merger could be the most recent ominous signal for radio | Invesloan.com

    April 27, 2026

    Sen John Fetterman breaks with Democrats to again White House ballroom | Invesloan.com

    April 27, 2026

    No youngsters, no care: Solo agers are hiring skilled ‘next-of-kin’ for main life selections | Invesloan.com

    April 27, 2026
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Finance Pro
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    invesloan.cominvesloan.com
    Subscribe for Alerts
    • Home
    • News
    • Politics
    • Money
    • Personal Finance
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Investing
    • Markets
      • Stocks
      • Futures & Commodities
      • Crypto
      • Forex
    • Technology
    invesloan.cominvesloan.com
    Home » Federal choose completely blocks Trump’s National Guard deployment to Portland | Invesloan.com
    Politics

    Federal choose completely blocks Trump’s National Guard deployment to Portland | Invesloan.com

    November 7, 2025
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    A federal judge on Friday ruled that the Trump administration’s attempt to deploy National Guard troops to Portland, Oregon, was unconstitutional.

    On Sunday, U.S. District Court Judge Karin Immergut, a Trump appointee, temporarily extended an order blocking the administration from deploying troops to The Rose City, saying the government failed to justify the move.

    In the Sunday evening order, Immergut temporarily blocked “Defendant Secretary of Defense [Pete] Hegseth from implementing” memorandums that authorized the federalization and deployment of National Guard members from Oregon, Texas and California into Portland.

    The injunction remained in effect until Friday.

    WHITE HOUSE REBUKES ‘EGREGIOUS’ COURT ORDER BLOCKING TROOP DEPLOYMENTS AMID PORTLAND UNREST

    Portland ICE protester

    A protester holds a sign as law enforcement officers stand outside an ICE facility, Oct. 21, in Portland, Ore. (AP Photo/Jenny Kane, File)

    Friday’s 106-page ruling makes the order permanent.

    It followed a three-day trial over whether protests at the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement building in Portland warranted use of the military domestically under federal law.

    The administration said the troops were needed to protect federal personnel and property.

    PORTLAND POLICE ACCUSE FEDERAL TROOPS OF INFLAMING ANTI-ICE PROTESTS, WHICH CITY CLAIMS HAVE NOT BEEN VIOLENT

    Protesters in Portland

    Law enforcement officers walk out of the gates of an ICE facility in Portland, Ore., toward protesters, Oct. 11.  (AP Photo/Jenny Kane, File)

    Immergut said in the ruling the “evidence demonstrates that these deployments, which were objected to by Oregon’s governor and not requested by the federal officials in charge of protection of the ICE building, exceeded the President’s authority” because he wasn’t able to demonstrate there was a rebellion or threat of rebellion that couldn’t be enforced without the military.

    The judge added that “even giving great deference to the President’s determination, the President did not have a lawful basis to federalize the National Guard.”

    Immergut called the order unconstitutional, saying that it violated the 10th Amendment, “which ‘reserves to the States’ any powers not expressly delegated to the federal government in the Constitution.”

    Federal agents stand outside an ICE facility in Portland, Ore.

    Federal agents stand outside an ICE facility in Portland, Ore. (Mathieu Lewis-Rolland/Getty Images)

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    The city of Portland and state of Oregon had sued the administration over the deployment in September after Hegseth sent 200 troops to the city.

    The administration can appeal the decision. 

    The administration also faces a temporary injunction in Chicago, where a judge has barred the administration from deploying troops.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Keep Reading

    Sen John Fetterman breaks with Democrats to again White House ballroom | Invesloan.com

    Rep Tom Kean Jr misses 50 votes forward of GOP’s important legislative week | Invesloan.com

    Republicans push to fast-track Trump’s White House ballroom after capturing | Invesloan.com

    NYC Mayor Mamdani vetoes NYPD protest plan invoice citing free speech considerations | Invesloan.com

    DNC vice chair Malcolm Kenyatta calls Sen. Fetterman ‘a multitude’ on X | Invesloan.com

    GOP governor hopeful can’t identify a Trump coverage he opposes. His firm can listing many | Invesloan.com

    Former Biden HHS Secretary’s governor bid shadowed by migrant kids controversy | Invesloan.com

    NYC Mayor Mamdani accused of ‘shifting the goalposts’ on poverty by analyst | Invesloan.com

    Pentagon kills 3 in one other strike on suspected drug-trafficking vessel | Invesloan.com

    LATEST NEWS

    A attainable SiriusXM-iHeartMedia merger could be the most recent ominous signal for radio | Invesloan.com

    April 27, 2026

    Sen John Fetterman breaks with Democrats to again White House ballroom | Invesloan.com

    April 27, 2026

    No youngsters, no care: Solo agers are hiring skilled ‘next-of-kin’ for main life selections | Invesloan.com

    April 27, 2026

    Rep Tom Kean Jr misses 50 votes forward of GOP’s important legislative week | Invesloan.com

    April 27, 2026
    POPULAR

    China’s first passenger jet completes maiden commercial flight

    May 28, 2023

    Numbers taking US accountancy exams drop to lowest level in 17 years

    May 29, 2023

    Toyota chair faces removal vote over governance issues

    May 29, 2023
    Advertisement
    Load WordPress Sites in as fast as 37ms!
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest WhatsApp Instagram
    © 2007-2023 Invesloan.com All Rights Reserved.
    • Privacy
    • Terms
    • Press Release
    • Advertise
    • Contact

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    invesloan.com
    Manage Cookie Consent
    To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    • Manage options
    • Manage services
    • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
    • Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    • {title}
    • {title}
    • {title}