What's Hot

    Lumentum’s new income forecast additional fuels one of many market’s hottest shares | Invesloan.com

    March 18, 2026

    Preferred Bank declares $0.80 dividend | Invesloan.com

    March 18, 2026

    Almost 1 in 3 Americans doesn’t know when — or even when — they will retire | Invesloan.com

    March 18, 2026
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Finance Pro
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    invesloan.cominvesloan.com
    Subscribe for Alerts
    • Home
    • News
    • Politics
    • Money
    • Personal Finance
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Investing
    • Markets
      • Stocks
      • Futures & Commodities
      • Crypto
      • Forex
    • Technology
    invesloan.cominvesloan.com
    Home » MAGA Is Once Again Divided Over AI and States’ Rights | Invesloan.com
    Money

    MAGA Is Once Again Divided Over AI and States’ Rights | Invesloan.com

    November 20, 2025Updated:November 20, 2025
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    If you thought Republicans were done arguing among themselves about AI, think again.

    President Donald Trump is revisiting efforts to restrict states’ ability to regulate artificial intelligence, and it’s drawing significant pushback from members of his own party.

    In a Tuesday Truth Social post, Trump said that “overregulation by the States is threatening to undermine” the AI industry, calling for “one Federal Standard instead of a patchwork of 50 State Regulatory Regimes.”

    The Trump administration is also reportedly drafting an executive order that would allow the Department of Justice to sue states over their AI regulations, though a White House official told BI that until an official announcement, “discussion about potential executive orders is speculation.”

    It’s shaping up to be a repeat of a fight Republicans had over the summer, when lawmakers tried to include a 10-year moratorium on state-level AI regulation into the “Big Beautiful Bill.”

    “States must retain the right to regulate and make laws on AI and anything else for the benefit of their state,” Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia posted on X on Thursday morning. “Federalism must be preserved.”

    The AI provision was ultimately struck from the megabill in a 99-1 vote in the Senate in July, after a series of revisions and a contentious debate among Republicans.

    The Trump administration later released an AI Action Plan that called for withholding federal funding from states with strict AI regulations.

    Now, Republicans may try to do it again via a must-pass defense bill. House Majority Leader Steve Scalise told Punchbowl News on Monday that Republicans were looking at attaching a version of the provision to the National Defense Authorization Act, or NDAA, and Trump indicated that he would support such a move.

    “Put it in the NDAA, or pass a separate Bill, and nobody will ever be able to compete with America,” Trump wrote on Tuesday.

    Proponents of the idea have argued that it’s important for both the development of the AI industry and competition with China to prevent the emergence of a “patchwork” of different AI laws across 50 states.

    Opponents charge that states should have the right to enact AI safety laws, and that those laws are filling an important gap in the absence of federal regulation.

    “If it gets in the NDAA, it’ll be a huge problem,” Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri, a proponent of AI regulation, told reporters on Wednesday.

    Among those pushing back are Republican governors, including Ron DeSantis of Florida and Sarah Huckabee Sanders of Arkansas.

    “Stripping states of jurisdiction to regulate AI is a subsidy to Big Tech,” DeSantis wrote on X, saying that the provision would “prevent states from protecting against online censorship of political speech, predatory applications that target children, violations of intellectual property rights and data center intrusions on power/water resources.”

    “Drop the preemption plan now and protect our kids and communities,” wrote Sanders, who led a group of 20 states in opposing the AI moratorium in the “Big Beautiful Bill” over the summer.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Keep Reading

    Sarah Michelle Gellar Says Her Home Setup Helps Avoid Marital Conflict | Invesloan.com

    Senior Quant Issam Bazzi Is Leaving Cubist, Quant Arm of Point72 | Invesloan.com

    Amazon Says USPS Exited Deal Talks at ‘Eleventh Hour’ | Invesloan.com

    The USPS Is Nearing a Financial Breaking Point, Postmaster Warns | Invesloan.com

    AI Coding Boom Shifts Software Developers Toward Management | Invesloan.com

    The Career Rise of Bob Iger, Disney’s Former CEO | Invesloan.com

    Coolest Things I’ve Seen at WW2, Cold War Submarine Museums | Invesloan.com

    Fed Meeting Live Updates: Interest Rate Hold Likely As Oil Prices Soar | Invesloan.com

    We Moved to an Apartment Across the Country Without Seeing It in Person | Invesloan.com

    LATEST NEWS

    Lumentum’s new income forecast additional fuels one of many market’s hottest shares | Invesloan.com

    March 18, 2026

    Preferred Bank declares $0.80 dividend | Invesloan.com

    March 18, 2026

    Almost 1 in 3 Americans doesn’t know when — or even when — they will retire | Invesloan.com

    March 18, 2026

    Sarah Michelle Gellar Says Her Home Setup Helps Avoid Marital Conflict | Invesloan.com

    March 18, 2026
    POPULAR

    China’s first passenger jet completes maiden commercial flight

    May 28, 2023

    Numbers taking US accountancy exams drop to lowest level in 17 years

    May 29, 2023

    Toyota chair faces removal vote over governance issues

    May 29, 2023
    Advertisement
    Load WordPress Sites in as fast as 37ms!
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest WhatsApp Instagram
    © 2007-2023 Invesloan.com All Rights Reserved.
    • Privacy
    • Terms
    • Press Release
    • Advertise
    • Contact

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    invesloan.com
    Manage Cookie Consent
    To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    • Manage options
    • Manage services
    • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
    • Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    • {title}
    • {title}
    • {title}