What's Hot

    It’s virtually inconceivable to promote a apartment as of late: ‘I feel trapped’ | Invesloan.com

    September 18, 2026

    Syracuse soccer coach mocked for making an attempt to intimidate a ref, Mets medical employees seems to be misplaced & MLB WAG Brylie! | Invesloan.com

    September 18, 2026

    Trump Says He’s Banning MSNOW, CNN, and Politico From the White House | Invesloan.com

    September 18, 2026
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Finance Pro
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    invesloan.cominvesloan.com
    Subscribe for Alerts
    • Home
    • News
    • Politics
    • Money
    • Personal Finance
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Investing
    • Markets
      • Stocks
      • Futures & Commodities
      • Crypto
      • Forex
    • Technology
    invesloan.cominvesloan.com
    Home » Supreme Court blocks California ban on telling mother and father about gender transitions | Invesloan.com
    Politics

    Supreme Court blocks California ban on telling mother and father about gender transitions | Invesloan.com

    March 2, 2026Updated:March 2, 2026
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    The Supreme Court on Monday cleared the way for California schools to notify parents if their children want to change their gender identity without approval from the student amid a challenge against the Golden State’s ban on so-called forced outing of transgender students.

    The court granted an emergency appeal from a conservative legal group, the Thomas More Society, blocking, at least for now, a state law that prohibited automatic parental notification requirements if students change their gender expression or pronouns at school.

    The Thomas More Society praised the decision as “the most significant parental rights ruling in a generation.” Two sets of Catholic parents represented by the legal group argued that the state law, signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom in 2024, caused schools to mislead them and secretly facilitate the students’ gender transitions.

    California Gov. Gavin Newsom listens to a question during an event in South Carolina.

    Two sets of Catholic parents argued that the state law, signed into law by Gov. Gavin Newsom in 2024, caused schools to mislead them and secretly facilitate the students’ gender transitions. (Sean Rayford/Getty Images)

    But California contended that students have the right to privacy about their gender expression, particularly if they fear rejection from their families who may not support their decision to adopt a new gender identity. The state also said school policies and state law sought to balance student privacy with parental rights.

    Last year, state education officials told school districts that the state’s policy “does not mandate nondisclosure.” Newsom’s office also previously said that “parents continue to have full, guaranteed access to their student’s education records as required by federal law.”

    The Supreme Court sided with the parents on Monday and reinstated a lower-court order blocking the law and school policies while the case continues.

    “The parents who assert a free exercise claim have sincere religious beliefs about sex and gender, and they feel a religious obligation to raise their children in accordance with those beliefs. California’s policies violate those beliefs,” the majority wrote in an unsigned order, adding that state policies also burden the free exercise of religion.

    Supreme Court exteriors

    The Thomas More Society praised the decision as “the most significant parental rights ruling in a generation.” (AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson, File)

    Conservative Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas also said they would have gone a step further and granted the teachers’ appeal to lift restrictions for them. The three liberal justices dissented, saying the case is still working its way through lower courts and there was no need to take action now.

    “If nothing else, this Court owes it to a sovereign State to avoid throwing over its policies in a slapdash way, if the Court can provide normal procedures. And throwing over a State’s policy is what the Court does today,” Justice Elena Kagan wrote.

    A federal judge ruled in December 2025 that schools cannot prevent teachers from sharing information about a student’s gender identity with their parents, but an appeals court blocked that ruling last month, leading the plaintiffs to ask the nation’s highest court to step in.

    TRUMP ADMIN FINDS CALIFORNIA BAN ON NOTIFYING PARENTS OF GENDER TRANSITIONS VIOLATED FEDERAL LAW

    Supreme Court justices

    The Supreme Court sided with the parents and reinstated a lower-court order blocking the law and school policies while the case continues. (OLIVIER DOULIERY/AFP via Getty Images)

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    The high court has been weighing whether to hear arguments in cases out of other states such as Massachusetts and Florida filed by parents who say schools facilitated gender transitions without notifying them.

    The U.S. Department of Education also announced last month that the California law violates federal law. The findings of the federal investigation could put at risk the nearly $8 billion in education funding the federal government gives the state each year if state officials do not work with the Trump administration to resolve the violations.

    The Trump administration is also pursuing legal action against California and threatening to withhold funding over a policy allowing biological males to compete in girls’ sports.

    The Associated Press contributed to this report.

    Related Article

    Catholic group asks SCOTUS to block California law against revealing students' gender identities to parents

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Keep Reading

    Syracuse soccer coach mocked for making an attempt to intimidate a ref, Mets medical employees seems to be misplaced & MLB WAG Brylie! | Invesloan.com

    Judge Brinkema rejects DOJ bid to dismiss anti-weaponization case | Invesloan.com

    Medea Benjamin’s household basis gave $3.2M to CodePink since 2009 | Invesloan.com

    Matthew Lillard says he is ashamed for doing ‘Scream 7’ after Barrera firing | Invesloan.com

    Riley Green drops 19-track album ‘That’s Just Me’ and nation music followers cannot get sufficient | Invesloan.com

    Maye Musk defends Sydney Sweeney’s nude sports activities advert and remembers 12-year path to citizenship | Invesloan.com

    Ashley Biden threatens to sue Lindy Li over decline cover-up declare | Invesloan.com

    Jasmine Crockett faces backlash for honoring Chris Brown in Congress | Invesloan.com

    Judge Judy warns of hazard in not retrying Lindsay Clancy after mistrial | Invesloan.com

    LATEST NEWS

    It’s virtually inconceivable to promote a apartment as of late: ‘I feel trapped’ | Invesloan.com

    September 18, 2026

    Syracuse soccer coach mocked for making an attempt to intimidate a ref, Mets medical employees seems to be misplaced & MLB WAG Brylie! | Invesloan.com

    September 18, 2026

    Trump Says He’s Banning MSNOW, CNN, and Politico From the White House | Invesloan.com

    September 18, 2026

    XRP News: 16-Cross History Complicates the Golden Cross Signal | Invesloan.com

    September 18, 2026
    POPULAR

    China’s first passenger jet completes maiden commercial flight

    May 28, 2023

    Numbers taking US accountancy exams drop to lowest level in 17 years

    May 29, 2023

    Toyota chair faces removal vote over governance issues

    May 29, 2023
    Advertisement
    Load WordPress Sites in as fast as 37ms!
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest WhatsApp Instagram
    © 2007-2023 Invesloan.com All Rights Reserved.
    • Privacy
    • Terms
    • Press Release
    • Advertise
    • Contact

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    invesloan.com
    Manage Cookie Consent
    To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    • Manage options
    • Manage services
    • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
    • Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    • {title}
    • {title}
    • {title}