What's Hot

    Microsoft Leading Copilot AI Predicts the Shocking Price of XRP by The End of 2026 | Invesloan.com

    May 13, 2026

    Warsh faces fee strain as April’s inflation spike leaves the Fed with zero excuses | Invesloan.com

    May 13, 2026

    Pete Buttigieg caught on digicam being coached on 2026 election messaging | Invesloan.com

    May 13, 2026
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Finance Pro
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    invesloan.cominvesloan.com
    Subscribe for Alerts
    • Home
    • News
    • Politics
    • Money
    • Personal Finance
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Investing
    • Markets
      • Stocks
      • Futures & Commodities
      • Crypto
      • Forex
    • Technology
    invesloan.cominvesloan.com
    Home » Supreme Court sides with officer in protest-force case, bolstering certified immunity | Invesloan.com
    Politics

    Supreme Court sides with officer in protest-force case, bolstering certified immunity | Invesloan.com

    March 23, 2026
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    The Supreme Court on Monday ruled that a Vermont state police sergeant is entitled to qualified immunity in a lawsuit brought by a protester who said she was injured when an officer used a wristlock to remove her from a sit-in at the state capitol.

    In a per curiam opinion unsigned, the court reversed the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Zorn v. Linton, holding that existing precedent did not clearly establish that Sgt. Jacob Zorn’s specific conduct violated the Constitution. 

    “The Second Circuit held that Zorn was not entitled to qualified immunity,” the ruling read. “We reverse.”

    The justices said officers are generally shielded from civil liability unless prior case law put the unlawfulness of their actions “beyond debate.” 

    The case arose from a 2015 sit-in by healthcare protesters at the Vermont capitol on Gov. Peter Shumlin’s inauguration day. After the building closed, police moved to arrest demonstrators who refused to leave. According to the opinion, protester Shela Linton remained seated and linked arms with others. Zorn warned her he would have to use force, then took her arm, placed it behind her back, applied pressure to her wrist and lifted her to her feet. Linton later sued, alleging physical and psychological injuries. 

    The Supreme Court said the 2nd Circuit relied too heavily on its earlier decision in Amnesty America v. West Hartford, finding that case did not clearly establish that “using a routine wristlock to move a resistant protester after warning her, without more, violates the Constitution.” 

    On that basis, the justices concluded Zorn was entitled to qualified immunity and reversed the lower court.

    Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson. She argued the court had improperly stepped in with the “extraordinary remedy of a summary reversal” and said a jury could find the officer used excessive force against a nonviolent protester engaged in passive resistance.

    READ THE ORDER – APP USERS, CLICK HERE:

    This is a developing story. Check back for updates.

    Eric Mack is a writer for Fox News Digital covering breaking news.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Keep Reading

    Pete Buttigieg caught on digicam being coached on 2026 election messaging | Invesloan.com

    Trump arrives in Beijing for high-stakes commerce talks with Xi Jinping | Invesloan.com

    Diamond Resorts founder Stephen Cloobeck arrested on felony cost | Invesloan.com

    Chinese agent Eileen Wang donated to Rep. Judy Chu, FEC filings present | Invesloan.com

    Talarico ripped for absence throughout voting on invoice honoring slain preteen | Invesloan.com

    CIA whistleblower to testify on alleged COVID-19 origins cover-up | Invesloan.com

    Rep Tom Kean Jr stays absent from Congress as re-election battle looms | Invesloan.com

    Platner’s deleted submit throws wrench into PTSD protection for offensive remarks | Invesloan.com

    Dallas Mayor Eric Johnson says NYC punishes success, pitches ‘Y’all Street’ | Invesloan.com

    LATEST NEWS

    Microsoft Leading Copilot AI Predicts the Shocking Price of XRP by The End of 2026 | Invesloan.com

    May 13, 2026

    Warsh faces fee strain as April’s inflation spike leaves the Fed with zero excuses | Invesloan.com

    May 13, 2026

    Pete Buttigieg caught on digicam being coached on 2026 election messaging | Invesloan.com

    May 13, 2026

    See the List of 17 Routes and 1 Airport Abandoned After Spirit Closed | Invesloan.com

    May 13, 2026
    POPULAR

    China’s first passenger jet completes maiden commercial flight

    May 28, 2023

    Numbers taking US accountancy exams drop to lowest level in 17 years

    May 29, 2023

    Toyota chair faces removal vote over governance issues

    May 29, 2023
    Advertisement
    Load WordPress Sites in as fast as 37ms!
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest WhatsApp Instagram
    © 2007-2023 Invesloan.com All Rights Reserved.
    • Privacy
    • Terms
    • Press Release
    • Advertise
    • Contact

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    invesloan.com
    Manage Cookie Consent
    To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    • Manage options
    • Manage services
    • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
    • Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    • {title}
    • {title}
    • {title}