What's Hot

    Corporate revenue forecasts are topping expectations to an uncommon diploma. AI is a giant motive why. | Invesloan.com

    September 13, 2026

    Trump calls on Smithsonian to interchange sculpture with Washington statue | Invesloan.com

    September 13, 2026

    Former College Athletes: We’re Not Pushing Sports on Our Kids. | Invesloan.com

    September 13, 2026
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Finance Pro
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    invesloan.cominvesloan.com
    Subscribe for Alerts
    • Home
    • News
    • Politics
    • Money
    • Personal Finance
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Investing
    • Markets
      • Stocks
      • Futures & Commodities
      • Crypto
      • Forex
    • Technology
    invesloan.cominvesloan.com
    Home » DOJ’s ‘anti-weaponization’ fund quickly halted after Jan 6 prosecutor sues | Invesloan.com
    Politics

    DOJ’s ‘anti-weaponization’ fund quickly halted after Jan 6 prosecutor sues | Invesloan.com

    May 29, 2026Updated:May 29, 2026
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    A U.S. judge temporarily blocked the Justice Department Friday from “taking any further action pursuant to the creation or operation” of a $1.778 billion “Anti-Weaponization Fund.” 

    The Trump administration said last week that the fund will compensate Americans unfairly targeted by politicized federal investigations on a “case-by-case” basis.

    U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema’s order on Friday comes in response to a lawsuit filed by a group of plaintiffs that includes a former career prosecutor who alleges he was fired for his handling of Jan. 6 cases. The plaintiffs are suing to block payout from the fund. 

    The order, which lists the Justice Department as a defendant, states that the DOJ is blocked “from taking any further action pursuant to the creation or operation of the Anti-Weaponization Fund, which includes the transferring of money to the Fund; the consideration of any claims submitted to the Fund; and the disbursing of any funds from the Fund.” 

    TRUMP ADMINISTRATION PUSHES BACK ON ‘SLUSH FUND’ ATTACKS AGAINST ANTI-WEAPONIZATION FUND AND LAYS OUT WHO QUALIFIES

    U.S. President Donald Trump looking on during a meeting in Beijing

    President Donald Trump looks on during a meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing on May 15, 2026. (Evan Vucci-Pool/Getty Images)

    The judge also set a hearing for June 12 in federal court in Alexandria, Virginia. Fox News Digital has reached out to the Justice Department for comment.

    The plaintiffs challenging the fund include former Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew Floyd, an Alexandria resident who prosecuted Capitol riot cases in Washington, D.C., before he was fired last year by then-Attorney General Pam Bondi.

    Floyd was a deputy chief of the Justice Department’s Capitol Siege Section. He said he believes his firing was retaliation for his Jan. 6 work, according to The Associated Press. 

    Another plaintiff is California State University Channel Islands professor Jonathan Caravello, who was acquitted of an assault charge. He was accused of throwing a tear gas canister at federal agents during a 2025 protest against an immigration raid at a Camarillo, California, cannabis farm. 

    Also named as plaintiffs are the government watchdog Common Cause; the city of New Haven, Connecticut; and the National Abortion Federation, an association of abortion providers.

    New Haven claims the Trump administration officials have targeted it and other municipalities that they perceive to be “sanctuary” cities. The federation said it fears that the fund will issue payments to people who have attacked abortion clinics, providing an incentive for more violence against its members, the AP also reported. 

    NEWSOM WANTS TO CLAW BACK TRUMP FUND CASH AS CALIFORNIA BURNS BILLIONS ON RAIL AND OTHER ‘BOONDOGGLES’

    Justice Department building with overlay of Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche.

    An image shows the Department of Justice building with an overlay of Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images; Samuel Corum/Getty Images)

    The Anti-Weaponization Fund was born out of a settlement between President Donald Trump and the Internal Revenue Service. Trump filed the lawsuit against the IRS in January over the unauthorized disclosure of his tax records. 

    Claims will be determined by a five-person board appointed by the attorney general, with at least one member selected with consultation with congressional leadership, according to a Justice Department press release. At any point in time, the president has the power to remove a member without cause, it added. 

    “This is about seeking accountability for all Americans who were victims of law fare and weaponization: millions of Americans whose online speech was censored at the behest of the government, parents silenced at school boards, Senators whose records were secretly subpoenaed, churchgoers targeted by the FBI, and so on,” a Justice Department document stated. 

    The Anti-Weaponization Fund was slated to last until Dec. 1, 2028. 

    A banner featuring US President Donald Trump displayed on the US Department of Justice building facade in Washington, D.C.

    A banner featuring an image of President Donald Trump is displayed on the facade of the U.S. Department of Justice headquarters in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 20, 2026. (Drew Angerer/AFP/Getty Image)

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP 

    Funding for the Anti-Weaponization Fund is coming from the Judgment Fund, which is a permanent Treasury account used to pay for settlements and claims against the government. 

    Fox News’ Elaine Mallon, Kerri Urbahn and The Associated Press contributed to this report. 

    Greg Norman is a reporter at Fox News Digital.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Keep Reading

    Trump calls on Smithsonian to interchange sculpture with Washington statue | Invesloan.com

    Human vs ChatGPT in NFL Week 1 betting picks, from Bears and Packers to Texans and Lions | Invesloan.com

    Lindsay Clancy trial sparks on-line calls to repeal nineteenth Amendment | Invesloan.com

    Jason Chaffetz: 4 methods to make soccer extra thrilling to observe | Invesloan.com

    Biscuitville named greatest fast-food breakfast for fourth 12 months working | Invesloan.com

    GOP can preserve Black voter beneficial properties within the 2026 midterms, Shannon says | Invesloan.com

    Tom Tiffany escapes aircraft crash with minor accidents in Lake Wausau | Invesloan.com

    Arch Manning and Texas Longhorns erase 20-point deficit to stun Ohio State in stunning comeback for the ages | Invesloan.com

    Florida suspect faces tried homicide costs in gasoline station arson | Invesloan.com

    LATEST NEWS

    Corporate revenue forecasts are topping expectations to an uncommon diploma. AI is a giant motive why. | Invesloan.com

    September 13, 2026

    Trump calls on Smithsonian to interchange sculpture with Washington statue | Invesloan.com

    September 13, 2026

    Former College Athletes: We’re Not Pushing Sports on Our Kids. | Invesloan.com

    September 13, 2026

    Trending shares this week as markets finish decrease amid inflation, yield jitters (SP500:) (DJI:) (COMP:IND:) | Invesloan.com

    September 13, 2026
    POPULAR

    China’s first passenger jet completes maiden commercial flight

    May 28, 2023

    Numbers taking US accountancy exams drop to lowest level in 17 years

    May 29, 2023

    Toyota chair faces removal vote over governance issues

    May 29, 2023
    Advertisement
    Load WordPress Sites in as fast as 37ms!
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest WhatsApp Instagram
    © 2007-2023 Invesloan.com All Rights Reserved.
    • Privacy
    • Terms
    • Press Release
    • Advertise
    • Contact

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    invesloan.com
    Manage Cookie Consent
    To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    • Manage options
    • Manage services
    • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
    • Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    • {title}
    • {title}
    • {title}