What's Hot

    It’s virtually inconceivable to promote a apartment as of late: ‘I feel trapped’ | Invesloan.com

    September 18, 2026

    Syracuse soccer coach mocked for making an attempt to intimidate a ref, Mets medical employees seems to be misplaced & MLB WAG Brylie! | Invesloan.com

    September 18, 2026

    Trump Says He’s Banning MSNOW, CNN, and Politico From the White House | Invesloan.com

    September 18, 2026
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Finance Pro
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    invesloan.cominvesloan.com
    Subscribe for Alerts
    • Home
    • News
    • Politics
    • Money
    • Personal Finance
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Investing
    • Markets
      • Stocks
      • Futures & Commodities
      • Crypto
      • Forex
    • Technology
    invesloan.cominvesloan.com
    Home » Judge Brinkema rejects DOJ bid to dismiss anti-weaponization case | Invesloan.com
    Politics

    Judge Brinkema rejects DOJ bid to dismiss anti-weaponization case | Invesloan.com

    September 18, 2026Updated:September 18, 2026
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    ALEXANDRIA, Va. — Department of Justice lawyers have asked U.S. District Court Judge Leonie Brinkema to dismiss a case connected to the Trump administration’s $1.776 billion “Anti-Weaponization Fund,” arguing that Attorney General Todd Blanche issued a formal recission order in August and has affirmed many times, including under oath before Congress, that the fund is dead.

    However, Brinkema seemed skeptical on Friday.

    “The issues that underly this case are still alive and kicking in my view,” Brinkema said.

    “The real concern that lurks… is the concept of taxpayer money being used to promote particular political views,” Brinkema said, pointing to pro-life activists convicted of violating the FACE Act and others who attempted an “insurrection” on January 6th “to overthrow the legitimate election.”

    CLINTON JUDGE INDEFINITELY BLOCKS TRUMP’S $1.776B ANTI-WEAPONIZATION FUND

    Exterior shot of the Justice Department Building.

    U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema questioned whether the issues surrounding the Trump administration’s now-rescinded $1.776 billion Anti-Weaponization Fund remain unresolved. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

    “That entity is gone,” said Brinkema, referring to the Anti-Weaponization Fund and agreeing that Blanche has said under oath at his confirmation hearings that the fund is dead.

    “But is there a functional equivalent?” Brinkema said, referring to the DOJ’s ordinary Judgment Fund authority.

    The Judgment Fund is a permanent U.S. Treasury account managed by the Bureau of the Fiscal Service that pays court judgments and DOJ legal settlements against the federal government. Brinkema called that fund “a less transparent structure” and suggested that some defendants convicted of FACE Act crimes have already received large payouts from the DOJ’s Judgement Fund.

    JUDGE TEMPORARILY BLOCKS TRUMP DOJ’S NEARLY $2B ‘ANTI-WEAPONIZATION’ FUND

    Close up of the DOJ podium.

    Justice Department lawyers asked a federal judge Friday to dismiss a lawsuit challenging the Anti-Weaponization Fund, arguing Attorney General Todd Blanche formally terminated it Aug. 2. (Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

    Here Brinkema affirmed she was talking about the case of Paul Vaughn.

    Vaugh, of Centerville, Tennessee, was convicted in January 2024 for his role in blockading an abortion clinic in Mount Juliet, Tenn., in March 2021. Vaughn ultimately received a pardon and a taxpayer-funded payout from the DOJ’s Judgment Fund which he has confirmed to Fox News is “seven figures.”

    BIDEN ADMIN USED ABORTION GROUP DOSSIERS, INCLUDING PHOTOS OF MINORS, TO TARGET CHRISTIANS, DOJ REPORT REVEALS

    DOJ sign on the edifice of the building.

    Judge Leonie Brinkema said the issues underlying a lawsuit over the Anti-Weaponization Fund remain “alive and kicking,” despite the Justice Department’s insistence that the fund is dead. (Photo by Kevin Carter/Getty Images)

    DOJ lawyer Andrew Block asked what remedy the plaintiff wants given asked “the fund is dead.”

    Brinkema countered that although the case is nowhere near the remedy stage, “I think there are remedies.” She brought up the possibility of requiring a “neutral” person to oversee a fund, “not someone from the DOJ, which I see unfortunately as coerced,” in this matter.

    “A proper, unbiased look… There’s been too much talk from members of the administration, which undercut [DOJ’s] position,” Brinkema said. “They contradict themselves all the time.”

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Brinkema closed the hearing by telling both sides she intends to craft a new discovery order in the coming days, suggesting this case is far from over.

    Jake Gibson is the Fox News Department of Justice and Federal Law Enforcement Producer.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Keep Reading

    Syracuse soccer coach mocked for making an attempt to intimidate a ref, Mets medical employees seems to be misplaced & MLB WAG Brylie! | Invesloan.com

    Medea Benjamin’s household basis gave $3.2M to CodePink since 2009 | Invesloan.com

    Matthew Lillard says he is ashamed for doing ‘Scream 7’ after Barrera firing | Invesloan.com

    Riley Green drops 19-track album ‘That’s Just Me’ and nation music followers cannot get sufficient | Invesloan.com

    Maye Musk defends Sydney Sweeney’s nude sports activities advert and remembers 12-year path to citizenship | Invesloan.com

    Ashley Biden threatens to sue Lindy Li over decline cover-up declare | Invesloan.com

    Jasmine Crockett faces backlash for honoring Chris Brown in Congress | Invesloan.com

    Judge Judy warns of hazard in not retrying Lindsay Clancy after mistrial | Invesloan.com

    Judges’ behind-the-scenes coordination amid Trump immigration crackdown raises eyebrows | Invesloan.com

    LATEST NEWS

    It’s virtually inconceivable to promote a apartment as of late: ‘I feel trapped’ | Invesloan.com

    September 18, 2026

    Syracuse soccer coach mocked for making an attempt to intimidate a ref, Mets medical employees seems to be misplaced & MLB WAG Brylie! | Invesloan.com

    September 18, 2026

    Trump Says He’s Banning MSNOW, CNN, and Politico From the White House | Invesloan.com

    September 18, 2026

    XRP News: 16-Cross History Complicates the Golden Cross Signal | Invesloan.com

    September 18, 2026
    POPULAR

    China’s first passenger jet completes maiden commercial flight

    May 28, 2023

    Numbers taking US accountancy exams drop to lowest level in 17 years

    May 29, 2023

    Toyota chair faces removal vote over governance issues

    May 29, 2023
    Advertisement
    Load WordPress Sites in as fast as 37ms!
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest WhatsApp Instagram
    © 2007-2023 Invesloan.com All Rights Reserved.
    • Privacy
    • Terms
    • Press Release
    • Advertise
    • Contact

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    invesloan.com
    Manage Cookie Consent
    To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    • Manage options
    • Manage services
    • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
    • Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    • {title}
    • {title}
    • {title}