NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
A federal judge has disqualified Bill Essayli, the top federal prosecutor in Southern California, from overseeing two criminal cases after finding that he is unlawfully serving as a “de facto” U.S. attorney.
U.S. District Judge J. Michael Seabright ruled Tuesday that Essayli cannot participate in or supervise the prosecutions in the two criminal cases.
However, the disqualification will not take effect immediately, giving the Justice Department time to seek a stay pending appeal.
“We respectfully disagree with the court’s order,” Essayli said in a statement provided to Fox News.
APPEALS COURT RULES TRUMP ADMIN UNLAWFULLY APPOINTED NEVADA’S TOP FEDERAL PROSECUTOR
First Assistant United States Attorney for the Central District of California Bill Essayli speaks as U.S. and Canadian law enforcement officials announce federal charges and arrests of alleged members of a transnational organized crime group at FBI offices in Los Angeles, Calif., on July 7, 2026. (REUTERS)
“The President and the Attorney General have every right to select supervisors within the Justice Department,” Essayli continued, adding that “ultimately, this question will be decided by the Supreme Court, and I look forward to serving in my current role until then.”
Essayli originally served as interim U.S. attorney under an appointment that expired after 120 days. Then-Attorney General Pam Bondi subsequently appointed him as a special attorney and designated him first assistant U.S. attorney. He was never formally nominated by the president or confirmed by the U.S. Senate.
Seabright previously found that the arrangement did not lawfully make Essayli acting U.S. attorney but allowed him to continue supervising prosecutions under his other titles.
BLANCHE SURVIVES REPUBLICAN DEFECTORS AS TRUMP GETS HIS NEW ATTORNEY GENERAL
The First Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California, Bill Essayli answers questions during a news conference outside the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department in Rancho Cucamonga on Friday, April 10, 2026, regarding charges filed against Chamel A. Abdulkarim, who is accused of arson in a warehouse fire that destroyed paper products at an Ontario distribution center for Kimberly-Clark. (Photo by Anjali Sharif-Paul, The Sun/SCNG))
However, after the Ninth Circuit ruled over the summer against a similar arrangement involving a federal prosecutor in Nevada, Seabright decided to revisit the issue, according to the Los Angeles Times.
Attorney General Todd Blanche issued a revised designation last month to narrow Essayli’s authority and distinguish his situation from the Nevada case, but Seabright ruled the modified arrangement still gave Essayli enough authority to effectively occupy the vacant U.S. attorney position.
“In sum, Essayli is unlawfully serving as a ‘de facto’ United States Attorney,” Seabright wrote.
The ruling came as Essayli has been helping lead a high-profile Justice Department effort challenging California over more than 20,000 registered voters the administration says are likely noncitizens.
NINTH CIRCUIT QUESTIONS TRUMP DOJ’S EMERGENCY REQUEST TO SET ASIDE 20,000 CALIFORNIA MAIL BALLOTS
First Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli speaks to the press with LA County Sheriff Robert Luna and LAPD Chief Jim McDonnell in Los Angeles, California, on Dec. 15. (Sarah Reingewirtz/MediaNews Group/Los Angeles Daily News via Getty Images)
The Justice Department has asked a federal court to require ballots associated with those individuals to be separated while their eligibility is reviewed, and U.S. District Judge David O. Carter said he would issue a ruling Wednesday on the administration’s request.
“I think this case is really on the forefront of the administration’s battle to fight for election integrity,” Essayli said during a news conference Tuesday.
“We wanna stop illegal voting. We don’t wanna chase it later,” he added.
When asked about Seabright’s ruling during the news conference, Essayli gave reporters a brief response.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
“That case will be decided by the Supreme Court.”
