Stay knowledgeable with free updates
Simply signal as much as the Airlines myFT Digest — delivered on to your inbox.
Global airways have privately lobbied the EU to weaken plans to require the business to observe and disclose its impression on international warming from non-carbon dioxide emissions, together with the vapour trails that criss-cross the skies, in a letter seen by the Financial Times.
Airlines have confronted years of scrutiny over their contribution to local weather change by CO₂, however the impression of different emissions, together with plane condensation trails, or contrails, nitrogen oxides and sulphur, is much less understood or monitored.
In response, the EU is introducing landmark guidelines to require all airways to quantify and report the non-CO₂ emissions of flights taking off from throughout the bloc from January 2025, sparking a backlash from throughout the business.
Willie Walsh, the director-general of the International Air Transport Association, the airline foyer group, wrote to EU politicians this month to warn of “growing concern across the airline community”, within the letter seen by the FT.
The former boss of British Airways known as on Brussels to make participation within the scheme voluntary, and to considerably reduce its scope by solely making use of the foundations to flights throughout the EU.
In explicit, Walsh mentioned airways have been involved that non-CO₂ emissions can’t be calculated with the identical “high certainty” as CO₂, and the proposed methodology “is feared insufficiently mature to measure non-CO₂ emissions accurately, or to help address their mitigation effectively”.
“The proposal risks creating a regulatory burden that will require airlines to provide large amounts of data for all flights, with an insufficient potential for positive environmental impact,” he mentioned.
The EU already requires airways to reveal their CO₂ impression and levies a cost on intra-European emissions.
Environmental group Transport & Environment mentioned Iata is utilizing scientific uncertainty as a approach to cease the total local weather impression of flying from being disclosed.
Given that the worst impression from non-CO₂ emissions is assumed to come back from long-haul flying, excluding international airways from the scheme could be counter-productive, it added.
“Non-CO₂ emissions were recognised as a climate problem 25 years ago. But with delay tactics such as these, airlines are attempting to kill off any action that would allow them to address the issue,” mentioned Jo Dardenne, aviation director of Transport & Environment.
In an announcement, Iata confirmed it was “very concerned” with facets of the EU’s transfer to observe non-CO₂ emissions, and added that “the science around non-CO₂ impacts is highly uncertain and evolving rapidly”. It pointed to a latest Royal Society of Chemistry paper that known as for “better quantification of the actual effects” of non-CO₂ emissions earlier than “definitive courses of action” are taken.
The EU have been approached for remark.
Climate Capital
Where local weather change meets enterprise, markets and politics. Explore the FT’s protection right here.
Are you interested in the FT’s environmental sustainability commitments? Find out extra about our science-based targets right here