This article is an on-site model of our Unhedged publication. Sign up right here to get the publication despatched straight to your inbox each weekday
Good morning. This week’s information releases, culminating with jobs day on Friday, might be carefully scrutinised for hints of US financial slowing. The Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow fourth-quarter development tracker, which is able to incorporate all this information because it is available in, now stands at a middling 1.2 per cent. As an over-under guess, the place will GDPNow finish the week? We’ll take the over, however the margin may very well be slim. All ideas welcome: [email protected] and [email protected].
Why gold is at a file excessive
Gold costs closed at all-time highs on Friday, which appears a bit bizarre. The most essential variable for gold costs, traditionally, is actual charges, the chance price for holding a yield-free metallic. Exact measurements differ, however nevertheless you narrow it, we’re across the highest degree of actual charges since at the least the monetary disaster. Why is gold gaining?
Part of the reply lies in ranges versus charges of change. Real charges, utilizing yields on 10-year inflation-linked bonds (Tips) as a proxy, are certainly excessive however have fallen practically 50bp because the peak in October. That appears to have cleared the runway for gold costs:
Recent strikes in Tips yields elude straightforward rationalization. Economic resilience was a extensively cited motive for actual charges’ rise in September and October, so creeping indicators of slowdown could have spurred a reversal. Better inflation information additionally may need curbed fears of extra future inflation volatility, another excuse why actual charges may very well be larger. Whatever the rationale, it’s excellent news for gold.
A second tailwind is coming from a weaker US greenback. Gold is essentially priced in {dollars}, that means that USD weak point offers non-US gold consumers extra buying energy. The US greenback index fell 3.5 per cent in November, a response to rising expectations for US price cuts and traditionally an omen of gold rallies:
These two explanations, a falling greenback and decrease actual charges, don’t really feel absolutely satisfying, nevertheless. They held true at numerous factors earlier this yr, together with the flight to security after Silicon Valley Bank’s collapse, and no gold value breakout adopted. Something else is occurring.
Gold is taken into account a geopolitical threat hedge, making the Israel-Gaza conflict an affordable guess. In the week instantly after the Hamas assaults of October 7, gold costs leapt 6 per cent. But this, too, isn’t dispositive. More not too long ago, the tail dangers of the battle — particularly the danger of a wider regional conflict that will slam international markets — seem to have waned. Iran, a key actor, has sought to stop escalation, to present only one instance. The World Gold Council’s mannequin of gold returns had an abnormally massive “residual” time period in October, suggesting {that a} huge, unmodelled shock (akin to a conflict) had hit gold costs. The residual disappeared in November.
A ultimate rationalization is a structural change in central financial institution demand for gold. Ukraine-related sanctions inspired EM reserve managers to nudge their portfolios away from US greenback belongings (largely Treasuries) in the direction of gold. Unhedged is sceptical that this spells the tip of greenback hegemony, however even incremental adjustments within the greenback’s standing amongst central banks can matter to gold costs. As the chart under from Absolute Strategy Research exhibits, central financial institution gold reserves within the Brics+ bloc had been already rising earlier than the Ukraine conflict. Central financial institution gold shopping for hit file ranges in 2022, and is on monitor for a contemporary file this yr. Gold mining exercise, additionally on monitor for a 2023 all-time excessive, is responding to larger demand.

Put collectively, these 4 components pointing in the identical course seems like a extra full story. At the identical time, although, we battle to see the makings of an explosive gold rally. The metallic has tried and failed for 3 years to interrupt its ceiling of $2,050 or so. And the forces now boosting it could not have sufficient kick to maintain costs rising. Higher central financial institution demand is effectively telegraphed, geopolitical threat has waned and it’s unclear how a lot additional actual charges must fall. Still, if you happen to’ve a bull case to tout, or if we’ve missed one thing horribly apparent, tell us. (Ethan Wu)
Private fairness’s insurance coverage subsidiaries
Last week, non-public fairness home KKR introduced that it was shopping for the third of Global Atlantic it didn’t already personal, for $2.7bn. The FT story on the deal quoted KKR co-CEO Scott Nuttall saying the next:
“We are not doing this because we have to, we are doing it because we want to and this has been a home-run investment,” stated Nuttall. He pointed to synergies KKR may garner with full possession, akin to promoting non-public fairness funds it had designed for rich people to Global Atlantic’s present shoppers.
This remark struck me as barely off. Not the bit about GA being a home-run funding, which is true so far; the bit about promoting PE funds to insurance coverage shoppers. Big non-public equity-cum-asset managers purchase insurance coverage firms (see additionally: Apollo/Athene, Brookfield/American Equity) to not cross-sell, however to realize a supply of steady capital.
The PE insurance coverage firm subsidiaries promote annuities, that’s, contracts by which people change a lump sum for a sure degree of revenue over a sure time period, typically the remainder of the person’s life. The PE store then tries to earn extra from the cash than they must pay for it. It’s a ramification enterprise, like banking, though annuity withdrawals are, in concept, rarer than deposit withdrawals. For the annuity consumers, the essential level is that there are tax benefits to purchasing an funding product labeled, for vestigial causes, as insurance coverage. For the PE store, the essential factor is that an insurance coverage subsidiary offers them direct entry to retail buyers’ capital, which usually they’re solely allowed to entry not directly, by way of huge pension funds.
As with any huge structural shift in the way in which funding belongings are held, invested and distributed, we should always ask whether or not the change decreases or will increase threat within the system. The non-public credit score business usually factors out that they’re safer house owners of credit score belongings than banks, as a result of they use much less leverage and since they don’t take deposits, which may run. “Every dollar that moves out of the banking system reduces systemic risk,” Nuttall stated not too long ago. There is a great deal of fact on this.
But whereas annuity premiums could also be extra steady than deposits underneath regular circumstances, they’ll run. Customers can pull their premiums, at a penalty, and in the event that they change into satisfied that their annuity firm isn’t steady, that’s what they are going to do. This is what occurred to Executive Life, then the most important insurer in California, within the early Nineteen Nineties: policyholders withdrew $4bn after the corporate introduced losses from junk bond investments, and the corporate collapsed. Annuity capital isn’t everlasting capital. PE companies elevating capital by promoting annuities have to fret about maturity mismatches.
One attraction of the annuity enterprise for the large PE companies is that the capital raised might be put to work in credit score belongings that banks try to do away with anyway, in an period of excessive and rising capital necessities. These may embody leveraged loans, franchise finance or plane leasing. But — as Steven Kelly of the Yale Program on Financial Stability identified to me — as these belongings depart the banking system, regulators lose visibility on them. “Suppose we have a crisis, what can the regulators see? Who does the Fed lend money to?” Kelly asks. And regulators could not see the disaster coming as shortly as they might had been the belongings held in banks, with their common marking of belongings.
As Sonali Basak identified on Bloomberg final week, if the belongings are held inside insurance-company subsidiaries, insurance coverage regulators could have visibility, and there might be some required disclosures. This ought to assist offset this threat.
A extra distant threat that Kelly factors out is that particular person banks could change into overexposed to the non-public asset business on the deposit aspect of their steadiness sheets, the way in which Silicon Valley Bank was overexposed to the enterprise capital business. Annuity-holder runs towards PE companies’ insurance coverage subsidiaries may result in sudden and heavy withdrawals from banks.
All of those dangers are distant proper now, and may not crop up even in a nasty default cycle. But as retail capital flows to personal asset managers, and people managers pull dangerous credit score belongings out of banks, systemic threat will stay within the monetary system, even when it takes new types.
One good learn
Is South Korea disappearing?
FT Unhedged podcast

Can’t get sufficient of Unhedged? Listen to our new podcast, hosted by Ethan Wu and Katie Martin, for a 15-minute dive into the most recent markets information and monetary headlines, twice every week. Catch up on previous editions of the publication right here.
Recommended newsletters for you
Swamp Notes — Expert perception on the intersection of cash and energy in US politics. Sign up right here
Chris Giles on Central Banks — Your important information to cash, rates of interest, inflation and what central banks are pondering. Sign up right here