What's Hot

    U.S. shares are faring worse than throughout previous geopolitical shocks — and there’s loads of room for them to fall additional | Invesloan.com

    March 30, 2026

    DHS vows deportation arrests ‘will proceed’ as ICE maintains airport presence | Invesloan.com

    March 30, 2026

    REVIEW: Best Hummus at Grocery Store, Ranked | Invesloan.com

    March 30, 2026
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Finance Pro
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    invesloan.cominvesloan.com
    Subscribe for Alerts
    • Home
    • News
    • Politics
    • Money
    • Personal Finance
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Investing
    • Markets
      • Stocks
      • Futures & Commodities
      • Crypto
      • Forex
    • Technology
    invesloan.cominvesloan.com
    Home » Russian billionaires Fridman and Aven promote Alfa-Bank stakes in bid to overturn sanctions | Invesloan.com
    Business

    Russian billionaires Fridman and Aven promote Alfa-Bank stakes in bid to overturn sanctions | Invesloan.com

    February 5, 2025Updated:February 5, 2025
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Stay informed with free updates

    Simply sign up to the Russian business & finance myFT Digest — delivered directly to your inbox.

    The sanctioned billionaires Mikhail Fridman and Petr Aven have sold their stakes in Russia’s largest private lender and its insurance arm, as they attempt to overturn EU sanctions against them.

    Fridman and Aven offloaded Alfa-Bank and Alfa Strakhovanie to their longtime partner Andrei Kosogov last year, according to documents seen by the Financial Times, completing a deal struck in 2023 that values the two companies at about Rbs240bn ($2.5bn). The oligarchs held a combined 45 per cent stake in the bank and a 42 per cent stake in the insurer.

    Kosogov, who is not under sanctions, has emerged from relative obscurity to become the largest shareholder in Alfa-Bank and LetterOne, the Mayfair-based conglomerate, after buying out his sanctioned partners.

    The oligarchs hope that selling the bank and insurer — a deal expedited by Russian government intervention on ownership of “economically significant” firms — will aid their challenge to the EU sanctions imposed on them in response to president Vladimir Putin’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

    Last year, the EU’s General Court partially annulled the basis for the sanctions by ruling the bloc had not presented enough evidence to show Fridman and Aven were involved in efforts to undermine Ukraine.

    The oligarchs’ victory was the highest profile blow to the EU sanctions regime against Russia since the invasion.

    The EU sanctions remain in place, however, under a separate justification that points to Fridman and Aven’s status as “leading business persons [ . . .] involved in an economic sector providing a substantial source of revenue” to the Kremlin.

    Fridman and Aven are separately challenging that justification. If they are successful, EU member states could decide to lift the sanctions, appeal the court decision or reinstate them under another new justification. Latvia has appealed against the first ruling in the oligarchs’ favour.

    Anitta Hipper, EU spokesperson for foreign affairs, said the European Commission could not comment on ongoing legal proceedings. “Restrictive measures against Petr Aven and Mikhail Fridman remain in place — these were renewed based on the Council decisions in September 2023 and March 2024,” she said.

    Hipper added that the council of EU member states “regularly reviews the listings”.

    UK and EU sanctions forced Fridman and Aven, as well as their former partners German Khan and Alexei Kuzmichev, to cede control over investment group LetterOne and resign from its board.

    Kosogov, the former head of Alfa’s investment unit, had the smallest share in the oligarchs’ empire until he bought Khan’s and Kuzmichev’s stakes in Alfa-Bank and LetterOne in 2022, making him the largest shareholder in both companies. Khan and Kuzmichev lent Kosogov funds to buy their stakes in LetterOne for a combined $7bn and agreed an option allowing them to buy them back within 10 years, according to a High Court ruling in December.

    Kosogov then agreed a deal to buy Fridman and Aven’s stakes in Alfa-Bank via a Cypriot holding company and secured an agreement to finance the purchase with a loan from state-run Gazprombank, according to correspondence seen by the FT.

    The regulatory approval in Cyprus required for the sale stalled, however, prompting repeated public complaints by Alfa-Bank’s Luxembourg-based parent company.

    In the meantime, Russia passed a law allowing the state to redomicile “economically significant” companies held in western jurisdictions.

    The initial list of such firms released by Russia’s government last March only named six — the first three of which were the local holding companies controlling Alfa-Bank, Alfa Strakhovanie, and X5, the supermarket group founded by Fridman.

    Two months later, a Russian court annulled the Luxembourg-based company’s rights to Alfa-Bank and Alfa Strakhovanie, transferring Fridman and Aven the rights to hold the shares or offload them to Kosogov.

    Kosogov has undertaken to pay for the deal out of his own funds, according to the sale agreements.

    Though Cyprus approved the deal in July, the Russian decision had in effect rendered it moot as Fridman and Aven no longer needed to seek EU approval to transfer control of the Russian companies.

    The law “gives owners a legal way to wipe their hands, because it’s a court and government decision that they seemingly have nothing to do with, but the companies on the list always had good relations with the Russian government,” said Alexandra Prokopenko, a fellow at the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center in Berlin.

    By allowing Russian companies to pay dividends and protecting them from seizure under the sanctions, the process “ties their owners to the Russian regime even more closely”, she added.

    Fridman and Aven declined to comment. Kosogov did not respond to a request for comment.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Keep Reading

    Does personal credit score have a credit score high quality drawback? | Invesloan.com

    Iran battle lifts K-defence firm providing low-cost Patriot rival | Invesloan.com

    Subscribe to learn | Invesloan.com

    Subscribe to learn | Invesloan.com

    Pandemic oil merchants are the GOATs | Invesloan.com

    Subscribe to learn | Invesloan.com

    Subscribe to learn | Invesloan.com

    Subscribe to learn | Invesloan.com

    India cuts telecom spectrum costs as operator curiosity dries up | Invesloan.com

    LATEST NEWS

    U.S. shares are faring worse than throughout previous geopolitical shocks — and there’s loads of room for them to fall additional | Invesloan.com

    March 30, 2026

    DHS vows deportation arrests ‘will proceed’ as ICE maintains airport presence | Invesloan.com

    March 30, 2026

    REVIEW: Best Hummus at Grocery Store, Ranked | Invesloan.com

    March 30, 2026

    HireQuest Non-GAAP EPS of $0.19 beats by $0.06, income of $7M misses by $0.41M | Invesloan.com

    March 30, 2026
    POPULAR

    China’s first passenger jet completes maiden commercial flight

    May 28, 2023

    Numbers taking US accountancy exams drop to lowest level in 17 years

    May 29, 2023

    Toyota chair faces removal vote over governance issues

    May 29, 2023
    Advertisement
    Load WordPress Sites in as fast as 37ms!
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest WhatsApp Instagram
    © 2007-2023 Invesloan.com All Rights Reserved.
    • Privacy
    • Terms
    • Press Release
    • Advertise
    • Contact

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    invesloan.com
    Manage Cookie Consent
    To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    • Manage options
    • Manage services
    • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
    • Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    • {title}
    • {title}
    • {title}