Ever since Bari Weiss arrived as the head of CBS News, people inside and outside the company have been waiting to see whether her politics — and those of CBS owner David Ellison — would show up in the journalism.
This weekend, they may have gotten their answer. Or they may not have.
And that uncertainty is the problem.
It’s possible Weiss had legitimate editorial concerns about a “60 Minutes” segment on the Trump administration’s use of El Salvador’s notorious CECOT prison. CBS pulled the segment abruptly before it was scheduled to air on Sunday evening. News organizations do periodically delay or spike stories.
But the reported details around this decision make it hard to take the explanation entirely at face value. And Weiss’s position — and the politics surrounding her appointment — mean that editorial calls like this one will always be read for hints of political bias.
The segment, reported by Sharyn Alfonsi, had been promoted by CBS ahead of Sunday’s broadcast and, according to multiple accounts, had cleared the network’s standard internal processes. A few hours before airtime, CBS News announced that the segment needed additional reporting and editorial work.
Alfonsi saw it differently.
“In my view, pulling it now — after every rigorous internal check has been met is not an editorial decision, it is a political one,” she wrote in a note to her co-workers. “We are trading 50 years of ‘Gold Standard’ reputation for a single week of political quiet.”
Weiss, meanwhile, told her staff Monday morning that she held the story because “it did not advance the ball,” and because it didn’t include on-camera comment from the Trump administration, which had sent hundreds of Venezuelans to the prison, where many were reportedly tortured. She had previously sent a memo to “60 Minutes” producers complaining that the report they’d made didn’t provide viewers with “the full context they need to assess the story.”
There are two big problems with those arguments: 1) Making them so late in the process of a long-running investigation, shortly before the air date, is guaranteed to raise eyebrows. And 2) arguing that a story about the Trump administration can’t air without on-camera participation from the Trump administration leads to a chilling endpoint: If the Trump administration doesn’t want a story to run on “60 Minutes,” it can kill it by not showing up on camera.
Now, add in the environment Weiss stepped into. She arrived at CBS News through a deal engineered by Paramount’s owners, the Ellison family, at a moment when the Ellison family is deeply enmeshed with the Trump administration.
David Ellison’s father, Larry, who funded his son’s acquisition of Paramount, controls Oracle — which just got approval to acquire part of the US operations of TikTok, in a deal the Trump administration negotiated with the Chinese government. And the Ellisons are also trying to get Trump to favor their bid to buy Warner Bros. Discovery — a deal that would require approval from the Trump-controlled Department of Justice, as well as other regulators.
Trump, meanwhile, has already been complaining about “60 Minutes” under Ellison’s ownership. “For those people that think I am close with the new owners of CBS, please understand that 60 Minutes has treated me far worse since the so-called ‘takeover,’ than they have ever treated me before,” he posted on his Truth Social platform last week.
None of which proves that politics drove Weiss’ decision. And it’s understandable if the way “60 Minutes” used to work isn’t the way Weiss wants it to work — she’s the new boss, and she has spent much of her career complaining about big media institutions like “60 Minutes.”
But it explains why people are wondering if Weiss’ call was directly, or indirectly, influenced by her owner and his political status. I’ve asked Weiss for comment; a Paramount rep declined to comment.
What we do know is this: The decision was made inside a system where the people who own the newsroom need things from a president who wants leverage over the press.
In that world, suspicion isn’t paranoia. It’s a rational response to how power works. And it’s not something Weiss can fix, explain away, or out-communicate.
