What's Hot

    Blue Owl, FactSet in losers; Wells Fargo, CleanSpark in gainers: week's financials wrap | Invesloan.com

    September 12, 2026

    Alabama vs Kentucky over 48.5 is the school soccer betting play as each offenses look sturdy | Invesloan.com

    September 12, 2026

    I Created a Gmail Account for My Son When He Was 3 | Invesloan.com

    September 12, 2026
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Finance Pro
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    invesloan.cominvesloan.com
    Subscribe for Alerts
    • Home
    • News
    • Politics
    • Money
    • Personal Finance
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Investing
    • Markets
      • Stocks
      • Futures & Commodities
      • Crypto
      • Forex
    • Technology
    invesloan.cominvesloan.com
    Home » Federal decide blocks Virginia masks regulation shielding ICE from penalties | Invesloan.com
    Politics

    Federal decide blocks Virginia masks regulation shielding ICE from penalties | Invesloan.com

    June 30, 2026Updated:June 30, 2026
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    DOJ sues Virginia over anti-ICE policies as key anti-terror tool nears expiration

    The Department of Justice launched a lawsuit against Virginia concerning new anti-ICE policies, including a controversial mask ban for federal agents. Acting AG Todd Blanche argues these laws jeopardize federal officers. Concurrently, a major anti-terrorism tool, FISA, faces expiration tonight due to congressional inaction, raising national security concerns. Shannon Bream and Jim Jordan analyze the political stalemate and potential consequences.

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    A federal judge on Tuesday blocked Virginia from enforcing a new law that would prohibit federal agents — U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Border Patrol — from wearing masks while carrying out enforcement operations, siding with the Trump administration in a dispute over federal authority.

    Senior U.S. District Judge Robert E. Payne granted the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) request for a preliminary injunction, preventing the law from taking effect Wednesday while the legal challenge proceeds. The injunction will remain in place while the case is litigated.

    Payne found the federal government is likely to succeed on the merits because Virginia’s law attempts to regulate how federal officers enforce immigration laws, violating the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause.

    MINNESOTA SENATE VOTES TO BAN ICE FROM WEARING MASKS, ALLOW RESIDENTS TO SUE FOR CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS

    Masked ICE agents in California

    Masked federal agents are confronted by anti-ICE agitators. (Getty Images, File)

    The judge also found the government demonstrated it would likely suffer irreparable harm because enforcing the law could expose federal employees to “real risk of physical harm” while carrying out immigration enforcement duties.

    The ruling stems from a lawsuit the DOJ filed last week challenging two laws signed by Democrat Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger.

    The DOJ argued the measures would subject masked federal agents to criminal penalties and threaten agreements between federal immigration authorities and local law enforcement.

    DOJ ESCALATES BLUE-STATE ICE STANDOFF AFTER STATES REFUSE KEY FEDERAL REQUEST

    “Law enforcement officers risk their lives every day to keep Americans safe, and they do not deserve to be doxed or harassed simply for carrying out their duties,” Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said when the lawsuit was filed.

    “Virginia’s anti-law enforcement policies regulate the federal government and are designed to create risk for our agents,” he added. “These laws cannot stand.”

    The lawsuit argued Virginia was attempting to dictate how federal officers carry out law enforcement operations by restricting when they may wear face coverings, requiring them to display identifying information and placing conditions on cooperation agreements between local agencies and ICE.

    MINNESOTA SENATE VOTES TO BAN ICE FROM WEARING MASKS, ALLOW RESIDENTS TO SUE FOR CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS

    Abigail Spanberger speaks at inauguration

    Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger has ended agreements between state law enforcement agencies and federal immigration authorities. (Marvin Joseph/The Washington Post via Getty Images, File)

    According to the DOJ, federal officers who violated Virginia’s mask and identification law could have faced a Class 1 misdemeanor punishable by up to 12 months in jail, a fine of up to $2,500, or both.

    The lawsuit names Virginia Attorney General Jay Jones and Fairfax County Commonwealth’s Attorney Steve Descano as defendants.

    Payne’s order applies only to Virginia’s mask and identity law. The judge noted the Justice Department’s separate challenge to another provision governing immigration enforcement agreements will proceed on a different briefing schedule, with a hearing scheduled for Aug. 3.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    Spanberger, Jones and Descano have all taken steps to counter the Trump administration’s ICE agenda in Virginia.

    In February, Spanberger rescinded an executive order issued by former Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin directing state law enforcement agencies to cooperate with federal immigration authorities.

    Fox News Digital has reached out to Spanberger’s office for comment on the development.

    Fox News Digital’s Ashley J. DiMella contributed to this report.

    Greg Wehner is a reporter for Fox News Digital covering U.S. news and crime, with a focus on breaking developments, law enforcement, public safety and major stories shaping communities across the country.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Keep Reading

    Alabama vs Kentucky over 48.5 is the school soccer betting play as each offenses look sturdy | Invesloan.com

    Lady Gaga reportedly welcomes her first child with Michael Polansky | Invesloan.com

    Trump says he would ‘love’ to see Ireland unified as one nation | Invesloan.com

    Pennsylvania lawmaker calls on Trump to rename Lake Erie to ‘Lake Pennsylvania’ | Invesloan.com

    Abdul El-Sayed faces backlash over 9/11 submit and Hasan Piker ties | Invesloan.com

    Dabble Promo Code FOXNEWS: Pay $5 get $50 | Invesloan.com

    Underdog Promo Code FOXNEWS: Deposit match as much as $1,000 | Invesloan.com

    30% of faculty college students settle for violence as technique of stopping audio system | Invesloan.com

    WWE’s Rey Mysterio displays on Triplemania involvement, says he is unfazed going into match with 7-foot-3 big | Invesloan.com

    LATEST NEWS

    Blue Owl, FactSet in losers; Wells Fargo, CleanSpark in gainers: week's financials wrap | Invesloan.com

    September 12, 2026

    Alabama vs Kentucky over 48.5 is the school soccer betting play as each offenses look sturdy | Invesloan.com

    September 12, 2026

    I Created a Gmail Account for My Son When He Was 3 | Invesloan.com

    September 12, 2026

    ‘I still don’t have my MRI’: My well being insurer canceled my plan with out warning. Is that authorized? | Invesloan.com

    September 12, 2026
    POPULAR

    China’s first passenger jet completes maiden commercial flight

    May 28, 2023

    Numbers taking US accountancy exams drop to lowest level in 17 years

    May 29, 2023

    Toyota chair faces removal vote over governance issues

    May 29, 2023
    Advertisement
    Load WordPress Sites in as fast as 37ms!
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest WhatsApp Instagram
    © 2007-2023 Invesloan.com All Rights Reserved.
    • Privacy
    • Terms
    • Press Release
    • Advertise
    • Contact

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    invesloan.com
    Manage Cookie Consent
    To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    • Manage options
    • Manage services
    • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
    • Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    • {title}
    • {title}
    • {title}