What's Hot

    CoreWeave, Nebius shares tumble as Meta stands to turn out to be a recent menace within the cloud | Invesloan.com

    July 1, 2026

    ICE makes 10,000 arrests as Supreme Court upholds birthright rule | Invesloan.com

    July 1, 2026

    Sandisk’s and Micron’s shares sink because the rotation commerce builds, however provide shortages ought to restrict losses | Invesloan.com

    July 1, 2026
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Finance Pro
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    invesloan.cominvesloan.com
    Subscribe for Alerts
    • Home
    • News
    • Politics
    • Money
    • Personal Finance
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Investing
    • Markets
      • Stocks
      • Futures & Commodities
      • Crypto
      • Forex
    • Technology
    invesloan.cominvesloan.com
    Home » Justice Department sues California and Virginia over state gun legal guidelines | Invesloan.com
    Politics

    Justice Department sues California and Virginia over state gun legal guidelines | Invesloan.com

    July 1, 2026
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    The Justice Department escalated its push against state gun restrictions Wednesday, filing lawsuits against California and Virginia just a week after the Supreme Court reaffirmed that the Second Amendment is not a “second-class right” in its decision in Wolford v. Lopez.

    The coordinated legal challenges target Democratic-backed firearm laws in both states, with the department seeking to block California’s restrictions on the sale of new Glock-style semiautomatic pistols and Virginia’s ban on the manufacture, sale, transfer and purchase of certain semiautomatic firearms classified as assault weapons.

    The California lawsuit was filed hours after the state’s new handgun restrictions took effect, following Attorney General Rob Bonta’s refusal to negotiate with the Justice Department over what federal officials contend are unconstitutional limits on gun rights. Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon said the administration is taking alleged infringements of the Second Amendment seriously.

    COMER PROBES ALLEGED BIDEN COLLUSION WITH GUN CONTROL ACTIVISTS IN GLOCK LAWSUIT

    Virginia Governor Abigail Spanberger is seen speaking with reporters during an event on April 18, 2026.

    The redistricting failure is another headache for newly-elected Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger. (Graeme Sloan/Bloomberg/Getty Images)

    “This lawsuit is yet another example of this Justice Department enforcing the Second Amendment by protecting citizens against unconstitutional state regulation of firearms,” Dhillon said in a press release.

    Bonta revealed Tuesday that the Justice Department had sent California a notice of intent to sue, arguing the law violates the Second Amendment. In a response letter, Bonta rejected the Department’s legal position and refused to negotiate.

    “The Unsafe Handgun Act and Penal Code section 27595 are commonsense handgun design safety laws that help to prevent accidental discharges by experienced and non-experienced firearm users as well as the conversion of semiautomatic pistols into deadly automatic firing weapons,” Bonta wrote.

    “If the U.S. Department of Justice decides to file the lawsuit described in your letter, it will not be breaking any new ground.”

    Dhillon responded on X with a brief message: “See you in court.”

    The Justice Department soon afterward announced its lawsuit against California, naming Dhillon and Deputy Assistant Attorney General Jesus Osete as counsel.

    SPANBERGER’S LATEST ‘GUN-GRABBING NONSENSE’ PROMPTS ACTION FROM TRUMP DOJ: ‘STAY TUNED!’

    Governor Gavin Newsom standing at a podium at the United States Conference of Mayors meeting in Long Beach, California

    Gov. Gavin Newsom attends the 94th annual meeting of the United States Conference of Mayors in Long Beach, Calif., on June 4, 2026. (Myraneli Fabian/Anadolu)

    Gov. Gavin Newsom’s office accused the Trump administration of attempting to dismantle California’s gun safety laws.

    “Our response is simple — these laws save lives,” Newsom spokeswoman Diana Crofts-Pelayo said. “California has proven that strong, evidence-based gun safety measures can reduce gun violence while respecting the rights of responsible gun owners.”

    Crofts-Pelayo said California would not be “intimidated” by what she called politically motivated litigation and would continue enforcing laws designed to keep dangerous weapons off the streets.

    California has some of the nation’s strictest firearm regulations, which state officials credit with helping produce one of the country’s lowest gun death rates.

    The California lawsuit came shortly after the Justice Department sued Virginia over a newly enacted ban on so-called assault firearms.

    The lawsuit challenges Senate Bill 749, sponsored by state Sen. Saddam Salim, D-Dunn Loring, and signed by Gov. Abigail Spanberger in May. The ban took effect Wednesday, making it a misdemeanor to import, sell, manufacture, purchase or transfer certain semiautomatic firearms defined as assault weapons under state law.

    SUPREME COURT STRIKES DOWN BLUE STATE’S ‘VAMPIRE RULE’ IN MAJOR WIN FOR GUN RIGHTS

    Abigail Spanberger and gun shop

    Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger, left; a gun shop, right. (Mike Kropf/Getty Images; Charly Triballeau/Getty Images)

    Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said the Constitution “is not a suggestion” and that the Second Amendment is not a “second-class right.”

    Dhillon said she warned Spanberger in April that the Justice Department would sue if she signed the legislation and said Wednesday the administration was following through on that pledge.

    A spokesperson for Spanberger defended the law, saying the governor “firmly believes that firearms designed to inflict maximum casualties do not belong in our communities, near our kids and schools, or on Virginia’s streets.”

    “The Governor signed this commonsense legislation to save lives and protect law enforcement officers, kids, and families from gun violence — and the Governor remains committed to making the Commonwealth a safer home for every family,” the spokesperson said.

    Virginia House Minority Leader Terry Kilgore, R-Gate City, welcomed the lawsuit, saying the state is now using taxpayer dollars to defend “an unconstitutional gun ban against the United States itself.”

    “That is where the Richmond Democrats’ agenda has led — into court, on the wrong side of the Constitution,” Kilgore told Fox News Digital.

    “House Republicans said this law could not stand. A Virginia court has already blocked it, and now the Justice Department agrees. It should be repealed.”

    SIGN UP TO GET THE POLITICS NEWSLETTER

    The National Association for Gun Rights also praised the department’s actions.

    “Thank God a small number of committed individuals in DC realize we only have a few years of opportunity to make moves like this, and they’re seizing it,” the group said.

    Hannah Hill, executive director of the National Foundation for Gun Rights, said the Supreme Court’s ruling in Wolford v. Lopez, which she said strengthened Second Amendment protections, gave the Justice Department additional legal support for its latest lawsuits against California and Virginia.

    “The timing is perfect for the Department of Justice to begin to be filing these lawsuits to strike out gun bans all across the country, it’s a really bad time to be a gun grabber,” Hill told Fox News Digital.

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    The lawsuits came the same day the Supreme Court agreed to hear two Second Amendment cases next term challenging state and local bans on certain semiautomatic rifles.

    Fox News Digital reached out to Virginia Attorney General Jay Jones for comment.

    Elaine Mallon is a writer for Fox News Digital and Fox Business covering national politics. 

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Keep Reading

    ICE makes 10,000 arrests as Supreme Court upholds birthright rule | Invesloan.com

    GOP lawmakers proposes payments to finish start tourism after Supreme Court ruling | Invesloan.com

    Oversight Project unveils deportation plan after citizenship ruling | Invesloan.com

    Columbus, Ohio faces backlash for elevating Somali flag at City Hall | Invesloan.com

    RNC chair Joe Gruters predicts Republican win at first midterm conference | Invesloan.com

    Harris reaches out to socialist mayor Mamdani in newest signal she’s shoring up assist for potential 2028 bid | Invesloan.com

    Tim Walz blasts Supreme Court ruling on transgender athletes as merciless | Invesloan.com

    Torres weighs in after Kean Jr reveals despair as purpose for absence | Invesloan.com

    WATCH: Angel mother asks lawmakers why unlawful immigrants ‘matter more’ than Americans | Invesloan.com

    LATEST NEWS

    CoreWeave, Nebius shares tumble as Meta stands to turn out to be a recent menace within the cloud | Invesloan.com

    July 1, 2026

    ICE makes 10,000 arrests as Supreme Court upholds birthright rule | Invesloan.com

    July 1, 2026

    Sandisk’s and Micron’s shares sink because the rotation commerce builds, however provide shortages ought to restrict losses | Invesloan.com

    July 1, 2026

    GOP lawmakers proposes payments to finish start tourism after Supreme Court ruling | Invesloan.com

    July 1, 2026
    POPULAR

    China’s first passenger jet completes maiden commercial flight

    May 28, 2023

    Numbers taking US accountancy exams drop to lowest level in 17 years

    May 29, 2023

    Toyota chair faces removal vote over governance issues

    May 29, 2023
    Advertisement
    Load WordPress Sites in as fast as 37ms!
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest WhatsApp Instagram
    © 2007-2023 Invesloan.com All Rights Reserved.
    • Privacy
    • Terms
    • Press Release
    • Advertise
    • Contact

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    invesloan.com
    Manage Cookie Consent
    To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    • Manage options
    • Manage services
    • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
    • Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    • {title}
    • {title}
    • {title}