What's Hot

    Elon Musk's final xAI cofounder has reportedly left the corporate | Invesloan.com

    March 28, 2026

    SA Asks: What's one of the best information heart infrastructure inventory proper now? | Invesloan.com

    March 28, 2026

    SA Asks: What's essentially the most enticing house inventory proper now? | Invesloan.com

    March 28, 2026
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Finance Pro
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    invesloan.cominvesloan.com
    Subscribe for Alerts
    • Home
    • News
    • Politics
    • Money
    • Personal Finance
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Investing
    • Markets
      • Stocks
      • Futures & Commodities
      • Crypto
      • Forex
    • Technology
    invesloan.cominvesloan.com
    Home » Trump administration challenges California legislation banning ICE agent masks | Invesloan.com
    Politics

    Trump administration challenges California legislation banning ICE agent masks | Invesloan.com

    November 18, 2025
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    The Trump administration filed a lawsuit on Monday challenging California’s law banning federal immigration agents from wearing face masks to hide their identities, arguing that the measure is unconstitutional.

    The lawsuit claims that the state does not have the authority to restrict federal agents.

    California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed the No Secret Police Act and the No Vigilantes Act into law in September. Under the bills, most law enforcement, including federal agents, would be barred from wearing masks on the job and non-uniformed officers would be required to visibly display identification during their duties.

    Exceptions to the mask ban would be permitted for undercover agents, for those using medical masks like N95 respirators or as part of tactical gear.

    NEWSOM BANS LAW ENFORCEMENT FROM WEARING MASKS, TAUNTS ICE AGENTS: ‘WHAT ARE YOU AFRAID OF?’

    ICE agents wearing masks detain immigrants and asylum seekers reporting for immigration court proceedings

    The Trump administration filed a lawsuit challenging California’s law banning federal immigration officers from wearing face masks. (Getty Images)

    Newsom said that federal immigration officers would no longer be “hidden from accountability” while performing operations in California.

    “That’s not the America we’ve grown up in. And so we are pushing back,” he said ahead of the bill signings.

    Federal agents have conducted immigration raids in Southern California since June, targeting migrant workers at local businesses that sparked protests and the subsequent federal deployment of the National Guard and Marines. During the raids, some federal agents wore masks and hid their identities.

    The administration urged the court to deem the laws a violation of the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution and issue a preliminary injunction blocking California from enforcing the laws.

    The Supremacy Clause establishes that federal law is the “supreme Law of the Land,” overriding state law.

    CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE PASSES BILL PROHIBITING LAW ENFORCEMENT FROM WEARING FACE MASKS TO SHIELD IDENTITIES

    ice agents

    The lawsuit claims that the state does not have the authority to restrict federal agents. (Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images)

    The lawsuit also argues that the California laws violate Article 5, Section 301 of the U.S. Code, which says agency heads “may prescribe regulations for the government of his department [and] the conduct of its employees.”

    Attorney General Pam Bondi said on Monday that the California laws “discriminate against the federal government and are designed to create risk for our agents.”

    After Newsom signed the measures, administration officials directed ICE agents to ignore the California laws.

    The Department of Homeland Security said on Sept. 22 that it will “NOT comply with Gavin Newsom’s unconstitutional mask ban,” pointing to an increase in threats towards ICE officers.

    The lawsuit also argues that the California laws “would recklessly endanger the lives of federal agents and their family members and compromise the operational effectiveness of federal law enforcement activities.”

    Newsom and Trump face off

    Gov. Gavin Newsom has said that federal immigration officers would no longer be “hidden from accountability.” (Pool)

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    But supporters of masks for immigration agents say that the use of face coverings generates fear among the public and must be stopped.

    Newsom office said that California officials “will see the [DOJ] in court.”

    “If the Trump administration cared half as much about public safety as it does about pardoning cop-beaters, violating people’s rights, and detaining U.S. citizens and their kids, our communities would be much safer,” spokesperson Diana Crofts-Pelayo said in a statement to The Hill, referring to President Donald Trump pardoning more than 1,000 people who participated in the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riots.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Keep Reading

    Jeffries silent as Rep Cherfilus-McCormick faces expulsion risk | Invesloan.com

    JD Vance says he does not thinks UFO sightings are demons, not aliens | Invesloan.com

    Trump pushes $20 billion NASA lunar base to beat China to the moon | Invesloan.com

    Drinking Raw Milk Is Risky. Should People Be Able to Buy It Anyway? | Invesloan.com

    On CPAC’s Main Stage, Fissures within the Party Trump Remade | Invesloan.com

    House passes DHS funding invoice as lawmakers begin recess with out shutdown’s finish | Invesloan.com

    Spanberger denies redistricting deal as Luria faces backroom deal claims | Invesloan.com

    WATCH: Dems unclear on whether or not alleged unlawful immigrant assassin ought to’ve been deported | Invesloan.com

    House passes DHS funding patch as shutdown set to develop into longest in historical past | Invesloan.com

    LATEST NEWS

    Elon Musk's final xAI cofounder has reportedly left the corporate | Invesloan.com

    March 28, 2026

    SA Asks: What's one of the best information heart infrastructure inventory proper now? | Invesloan.com

    March 28, 2026

    SA Asks: What's essentially the most enticing house inventory proper now? | Invesloan.com

    March 28, 2026

    I Have 3 Teens. These Are the Battles I Don’t Fight. | Invesloan.com

    March 28, 2026
    POPULAR

    China’s first passenger jet completes maiden commercial flight

    May 28, 2023

    Numbers taking US accountancy exams drop to lowest level in 17 years

    May 29, 2023

    Toyota chair faces removal vote over governance issues

    May 29, 2023
    Advertisement
    Load WordPress Sites in as fast as 37ms!
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest WhatsApp Instagram
    © 2007-2023 Invesloan.com All Rights Reserved.
    • Privacy
    • Terms
    • Press Release
    • Advertise
    • Contact

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    invesloan.com
    Manage Cookie Consent
    To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    • Manage options
    • Manage services
    • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
    • Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    • {title}
    • {title}
    • {title}