What's Hot

    Is it OK to put on pajamas in your subsequent flight? A viral publish sparks debate. | Invesloan.com

    February 28, 2026

    Squad members Omar, Tlaib criticize Trump Iran navy motion strikes | Invesloan.com

    February 28, 2026

    US, Israel Launch Attacks on Iran As Tehran Retaliates | Invesloan.com

    February 28, 2026
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Finance Pro
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    invesloan.cominvesloan.com
    Subscribe for Alerts
    • Home
    • News
    • Politics
    • Money
    • Personal Finance
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Investing
    • Markets
      • Stocks
      • Futures & Commodities
      • Crypto
      • Forex
    • Technology
    invesloan.cominvesloan.com
    Home » NFL hit with $4.7 billion verdict in ‘Sunday Ticket’ antitrust trial By Reuters | Invesloan.com
    Stocks

    NFL hit with $4.7 billion verdict in ‘Sunday Ticket’ antitrust trial By Reuters | Invesloan.com

    June 27, 2024
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    By Mike Scarcella

    (Reuters) -The National Football League must pay more than $4.7 billion in class-action damages for overcharging subscribers of its “Sunday Ticket” telecasts, a California federal jury said on Thursday.

    Jurors in Los Angeles agreed with the plaintiffs that the NFL conspired with member teams to artificially inflate the price of “Sunday Ticket” for millions of residential and commercial subscribers.

    The jury awarded $4.6 billion to a residential class, and $96 million to commercial subscribers such as bars and restaurants, according to an attorney for the plaintiffs.

    A judge could award triple damages under U.S. antitrust law, bringing the total judgment to more than $14 billion.

    The NFL in a statement said it was disappointed by the jury’s verdict. “We will certainly contest this decision as we believe that the class action claims in this case are baseless and without merit,” it said.

    The NFL earlier this week asked the court to rule for the league and its teams as a matter of law, which could nullify the verdict.

    Attorneys for the plaintiffs in a statement on Thursday said: “We are pleased with today’s result on behalf of the classes we represent.”

    The trial, which began on June 5, capped more than a decade of litigation over the “Sunday Ticket” telecasts. 

    The subscribers accused the NFL of using agreements with broadcast partners to keep a stranglehold over distribution, allowing DirecTV to charge artificially higher prices as the former sole distributor of “Sunday Ticket.” 

    A residential subscription to “Sunday Ticket,” which is the only broadcast option for fans to watch out-of-market games, now costs as much as $449 through its current distributor, Google’s YouTube. DirecTV and Google were not defendants in the trial.

    DirecTV is owned by AT&T (NYSE:) and Google is owned by Alphabet (NASDAQ:).  

    The plaintiffs claimed that “Sunday Ticket” prices were inflated to limit subscriptions and protect distribution rights fees that CBS and Fox paid to air games in local markets.

    © Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Nov 5, 2023; Frankfurt, Germany; A general overall view as Kansas City Chiefs quarterback Patrick Mahomes (15) drops back to pass against the Miami Dolphins on the NFL shield logo in the first half of an NFL International Series game at Deutsche Bank Park. Mandatory Credit: Kirby Lee-USA TODAY Sports

    The NFL denied any wrongdoing and argued that “Sunday Ticket” is a “premium” product that expands viewers’ access to games, which are already broadcast for free on local networks.

    The plaintiffs are DirecTV subscribers who bought “NFL Sunday Ticket” between June 2011 and February 2023. The case includes at least 2.4 million residential customers and 48,000 commercial subscribers like bars and restaurants, according to court records. 

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Keep Reading

    US crypto coverage impasse is weighing on Bitcoin value | Invesloan.com

    Citi sees 3 main dangers in Pinterest inventory’s path to restoration | Invesloan.com

    Bitcoin is seeing promoting stress from this sudden supply | Invesloan.com

    Poland’s $1T financial system: Why buyers are shifting focus from Germany to Poland | Invesloan.com

    Oil finds short-term assist as oversupply eases, bearish dangers linger | Invesloan.com

    Commodity wrap: gold and silver finish risky week with small beneficial properties; oil rises | Invesloan.com

    Yum Brands posts combined earnings as Taco Bell outpaces KFC and Pizza Hut | Invesloan.com

    Trump pronounces US-India commerce deal, tariffs diminished to 18% | Invesloan.com

    All about OpenClaw: the newest AI agent that has taken the AI multiverse by storm | Invesloan.com

    LATEST NEWS

    Is it OK to put on pajamas in your subsequent flight? A viral publish sparks debate. | Invesloan.com

    February 28, 2026

    Squad members Omar, Tlaib criticize Trump Iran navy motion strikes | Invesloan.com

    February 28, 2026

    US, Israel Launch Attacks on Iran As Tehran Retaliates | Invesloan.com

    February 28, 2026

    Need a facet hustle to assist your retirement goals? Here’s methods to discover work proper now. | Invesloan.com

    February 28, 2026
    POPULAR

    China’s first passenger jet completes maiden commercial flight

    May 28, 2023

    Numbers taking US accountancy exams drop to lowest level in 17 years

    May 29, 2023

    Toyota chair faces removal vote over governance issues

    May 29, 2023
    Advertisement
    Load WordPress Sites in as fast as 37ms!
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest WhatsApp Instagram
    © 2007-2023 Invesloan.com All Rights Reserved.
    • Privacy
    • Terms
    • Press Release
    • Advertise
    • Contact

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    invesloan.com
    Manage Cookie Consent
    To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    • Manage options
    • Manage services
    • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
    • Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    • {title}
    • {title}
    • {title}