What's Hot

    BlackRock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund declares $0.1238 dividend (NYSE:FRA) | Invesloan.com

    September 11, 2026

    Dallas protest attracts 300 Democrats rallying towards Trump and the GOP | Invesloan.com

    September 11, 2026

    Google Completed Its Talent Deal for AI Agents Startup Mechanize | Invesloan.com

    September 11, 2026
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Finance Pro
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    invesloan.cominvesloan.com
    Subscribe for Alerts
    • Home
    • News
    • Politics
    • Money
    • Personal Finance
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Investing
    • Markets
      • Stocks
      • Futures & Commodities
      • Crypto
      • Forex
    • Technology
    invesloan.cominvesloan.com
    Home » Mike Johnson’s Open to Congress Stock Trade Ban. Here’s Where Things Stand. | Invesloan.com
    Money

    Mike Johnson’s Open to Congress Stock Trade Ban. Here’s Where Things Stand. | Invesloan.com

    May 10, 2025Updated:May 10, 2025
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    You may have heard this story before: The Speaker of the House is open to the idea of banning members of Congress from trading stocks, but it’s not exactly clear whether it will happen.

    That’s where we were three years ago, when then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi — after initially causing a firestorm by rejecting the idea — told reporters that she was “okay with that” if that’s what her colleagues wanted to do.

    That’s where we are again, with Speaker Mike Johnson telling NPR earlier this month that he’s “open to the conversation.”

    “It’s been talked about for quite some time,” Johnson observed. “But there’s probably a reason that the bill hasn’t moved in all those years because there’s never been a consensus built around it.”

    Johnson is correct. Despite the broad popularity of banning members of Congress from trading stocks — along with renewed interest driven by scrutiny of recent trades made by lawmakers like Republican Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia and Rob Bresnahan of Pennsylvania — the task of actually passing a bill to do it has never been straightforward.

    As of now, there are several proposals in both chambers that would address the issue, and each one is a little bit different. There’s the question of whether spouses should be included in a ban. There are differing views about the feasibility of using blind trusts. And if someone violates the rules, what should be the punishment?

    These are all solvable questions, and during the last Congress, a group of senators with dueling bills managed to come together around a common proposal. But we’re in a new Congress now, and lawmakers have largely returned to introducing their own bills.

    It’s also a matter of prioritization.

    Sure, politicians ranging from President Donald Trump, to House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, to Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, to Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri all support the idea. But it’s ultimately up to GOP leaders like Johnson and Senate Minority Leader John Thune — who told NPR that the current rules around stock trading disclosures are “pretty good” already — to decide it’s an issue worth taking up.

    In the meantime, they’re spending most of their time trying to muscle through a sweeping fiscal bill that’s set to include changes to the tax code and spending cuts.

    Even if Johnson and Thune decide it’s important, success isn’t guaranteed.

    In 2022, Pelosi and House Democratic leaders ultimately did move towards a vote on banning members of Congress from trading stocks, only to yank the bill due to internal opposition.

    This year, it may take pressure from Johnson’s right flank to spur Congress to action.

    “It’s been sitting out there for three or four years, we kind of keep dragging feet, and it’s time to deal with it,” Republican Rep. Chip Roy of Texas told BI in January.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Keep Reading

    Google Completed Its Talent Deal for AI Agents Startup Mechanize | Invesloan.com

    Hugging Face CEO Dismisses Ex-Anthropic Researcher’s AI Warnings | Invesloan.com

    What Makes AI Different From Nuclear War, Climate Change, and Asteroids | Invesloan.com

    Confluent Cofounder: AI ‘Dark Side’ Isn’t a Marketing Ploy | Invesloan.com

    ‘Big Short’ Michael Burry Buys Wine to Hedge Against Dollar, AI Doom | Invesloan.com

    How Different US Cities Remember 9/11, 25 Years Later | Invesloan.com

    I work at Trader Joe’s. I swear by these 12 purchases each time. | Invesloan.com

    Vintage Photos Show What Airport Security Was Like Before 9/11 | Invesloan.com

    SpaceX Strikes $1 Billion a Month Compute Deal With Mystery Customer | Invesloan.com

    LATEST NEWS

    BlackRock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund declares $0.1238 dividend (NYSE:FRA) | Invesloan.com

    September 11, 2026

    Dallas protest attracts 300 Democrats rallying towards Trump and the GOP | Invesloan.com

    September 11, 2026

    Google Completed Its Talent Deal for AI Agents Startup Mechanize | Invesloan.com

    September 11, 2026

    Quarter-Point Hike Leads Polymarket’s September Fed Pricing at 62% | Invesloan.com

    September 11, 2026
    POPULAR

    China’s first passenger jet completes maiden commercial flight

    May 28, 2023

    Numbers taking US accountancy exams drop to lowest level in 17 years

    May 29, 2023

    Toyota chair faces removal vote over governance issues

    May 29, 2023
    Advertisement
    Load WordPress Sites in as fast as 37ms!
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest WhatsApp Instagram
    © 2007-2023 Invesloan.com All Rights Reserved.
    • Privacy
    • Terms
    • Press Release
    • Advertise
    • Contact

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    invesloan.com
    Manage Cookie Consent
    To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    • Manage options
    • Manage services
    • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
    • Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    • {title}
    • {title}
    • {title}