What's Hot

    Oil costs climb after disputed report of Iran strike on U.S. warship within the Strait of Hormuz | Invesloan.com

    May 4, 2026

    Melania Trump’s advisor requires advertiser drop Jimmy Kimmel’s present | Invesloan.com

    May 4, 2026

    Binance CEO Says Crypto Has Captured Just 0.15% of Financial Services: Is the Biggest Rally Still Ahead? | Invesloan.com

    May 4, 2026
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Finance Pro
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    invesloan.cominvesloan.com
    Subscribe for Alerts
    • Home
    • News
    • Politics
    • Money
    • Personal Finance
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Investing
    • Markets
      • Stocks
      • Futures & Commodities
      • Crypto
      • Forex
    • Technology
    invesloan.cominvesloan.com
    Home » Hundreds of Wallets Drained in Ongoing Cross-Chain Attack, ZachXBT Warns | Invesloan.com
    Crypto

    Hundreds of Wallets Drained in Ongoing Cross-Chain Attack, ZachXBT Warns | Invesloan.com

    January 2, 2026Updated:January 2, 2026
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    An active cross-chain exploit is draining hundreds of crypto wallets across multiple EVM-compatible blockchains, with losses exceeding $107,000 and climbing as the attack continues.

    Blockchain investigator ZachXBT flagged the incident in the early hours of Friday, warning that victims are losing relatively small amounts per wallet (typically under $2,000), while the root cause remains unidentified.

    The coordinated attack follows a devastating December for crypto security, which saw $76 million stolen across 26 major exploits, including a $50 million address poisoning scam and the Christmas Day Trust Wallet breach that drained roughly $7 million from users.

    Source: Telegram

    Attack Pattern Emerges Across Multiple Blockchains

    ZachXBT identified a suspicious address (0xAc2***9bFB) that may be linked to ongoing thefts targeting EVM chains.

    The investigator is compiling verified addresses of theft victims as more victims come forward and is requesting that affected users contact him directly via X (formerly Twitter).

    The distributed attack mirrors tactics seen in recent high-profile incidents, in which attackers exploit multiple smaller wallets rather than targeting a single large holding.

    This approach often evades immediate detection while maximizing total extraction across compromised accounts.

    Security researchers note that the cross-chain nature suggests sophisticated infrastructure, with threat actors operating simultaneously across different blockchain networks to drain funds before victims can respond.

    Beyond EVM chains, the attack methodology resembles patterns observed in address-poisoning schemes and private-key compromises that have plagued the industry over recent months.

    HACKERS ARE QUIETLY STEALING FUNDS FROM EVERYDAY WALLETS ACROSS EVM CHAINS

    Researcher ZachXBT warns that hundreds of wallets are being drained across multiple EVM networks.

    Most victims lose small amounts (under $2K), but the total stolen has already reached $107K.

    The exact… pic.twitter.com/Jl6DcI0JqE

    — Zia ul Haque (@ImZiaulHaque) January 2, 2026

    Experts emphasize that the coordinated timing and multi-chain execution indicate well-resourced attackers capable of maintaining persistent infrastructure across various blockchain environments.

    Trust Wallet Breach Highlights Broader Vulnerability Crisis

    The alert comes days after Trust Wallet users faced fresh complications when the company’s Chrome extension was temporarily removed from the Chrome Web Store, delaying a crucial claims verification tool for victims of the Christmas Day hack.

    Trust Wallet CEO Eowyn Chen confirmed that Google acknowledged a technical bug encountered during the new version release.

    “We understand how concerning this is, and our team is actively working on the issue,” Trust Wallet stated after identifying 2,520 drained wallet addresses linked to roughly $8.5 million in stolen assets across 17 attacker-controlled wallets.

    The December 25 breach stemmed from a malicious version 2.68 of Trust Wallet’s browser extension, which appeared legitimate, passed Chrome’s review process, but contained hidden code that extracted recovery phrases.

    Users who installed the compromised extension and logged in between December 24 and 26 faced immediate fund outflows across multiple blockchains, including Ethereum, Bitcoin, and Solana.

    @TrustWallet users affected by the Chrome extension hack are still waiting for the claims tool after the extension was pulled due to a Chrome Web Store bug#TrustWallet #CryptoSecurity #Chromehttps://t.co/O6atPd0DVa

    — Cryptonews.com (@cryptonews) January 1, 2026

    Trust Wallet traced the incident to a broader supply-chain attack known as Sha1-Hulud, which surfaced in November and compromised multiple companies through exposed GitHub secrets and a leaked Chrome Web Store API key.

    The attack bypassed internal approval checks, allowing direct uploads of malicious code that appeared authentic to both automated security systems and manual reviewers.

    Industry Faces Human-Layer Security Crisis

    Mitchell Amador, CEO of Immunefi, warns that the crypto sector confronts a fundamental security reckoning as attack vectors increasingly target operational vulnerabilities rather than smart contract code.

    “The threat landscape is shifting from onchain code vulnerabilities to operational security and treasury-level attacks,” he told Cryptonews. “As code hardens, attackers target the human element.“

    Despite December’s 60% month-over-month decline in hack losses to $76 million, down from November’s $194.2 million, security experts emphasize that persistent threats remain.

    “Crypto is facing a security reckoning,” Amador stated. “Most hacks this year haven’t occurred due to poor audits, they’ve happened after launch, during protocol upgrades, or through integration vulnerabilities.“

    Blockchain security firm PeckShield documented 26 major exploits in December, with address-poisoning scams and private-key leaks accounting for substantial losses.

    🚨 Crypto trader loses $50 million to address poisoning scam as industry grapples with nearly $90 billion in cumulative security losses.#Crypto #Scamhttps://t.co/ZXn2iF8wdi

    — Cryptonews.com (@cryptonews) December 20, 2025

    One victim lost $50 million after mistakenly copying a fraudulent address that visually mimicked their intended destination.

    Another major incident involved a private key leak tied to a multi-signature wallet, resulting in losses of approximately $27.3 million.

    The industry’s vulnerability extends beyond technical exploits to social engineering schemes, with Brooklyn resident Ronald Spektor facing charges for allegedly stealing $16 million from roughly 100 Coinbase users by impersonating company employees.

    The post Hundreds of Wallets Drained in Ongoing Cross-Chain Attack, ZachXBT Warns appeared first on Cryptonews.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Keep Reading

    Binance CEO Says Crypto Has Captured Just 0.15% of Financial Services: Is the Biggest Rally Still Ahead? | Invesloan.com

    Bitcoin News: $80,000 Resistance Broken as Saylor Signals Strategy Buy Return | Invesloan.com

    The Best Undervalued Crypto in 2026 Started Its Presale Today – Divine Ray on Cosmos | Invesloan.com

    XRP Price Prediction: Escrow Relocked, Price Rallying Above $1.40 – Ripple Bullrun? | Invesloan.com

    DOGE Open Interest Hits 2026 High as Meme-Coin Flows Lift Maxi Doge Presale to $4.75M | Invesloan.com

    XRP Price Analysis: Buy Now or Wait for Ripple to Fall Below $1? | Invesloan.com

    The WSJ Just Linked Trump Crypto Venture to a Billion-Dollar Pig Butchering Scam Network: How Deep Does It Go? | Invesloan.com

    Pump.Fun Launch Charity Coins Redemption Arc: What Is The Best Meme Coin to Buy? | Invesloan.com

    Sam Altman ChatGPT AI Predicts the Price of XRP, Bitcoin and Ethereum By the End of May 2026 | Invesloan.com

    LATEST NEWS

    Oil costs climb after disputed report of Iran strike on U.S. warship within the Strait of Hormuz | Invesloan.com

    May 4, 2026

    Melania Trump’s advisor requires advertiser drop Jimmy Kimmel’s present | Invesloan.com

    May 4, 2026

    Binance CEO Says Crypto Has Captured Just 0.15% of Financial Services: Is the Biggest Rally Still Ahead? | Invesloan.com

    May 4, 2026

    Amazon opens logistics community to all companies (AMZN:NASDAQ) | Invesloan.com

    May 4, 2026
    POPULAR

    China’s first passenger jet completes maiden commercial flight

    May 28, 2023

    Numbers taking US accountancy exams drop to lowest level in 17 years

    May 29, 2023

    Toyota chair faces removal vote over governance issues

    May 29, 2023
    Advertisement
    Load WordPress Sites in as fast as 37ms!
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest WhatsApp Instagram
    © 2007-2023 Invesloan.com All Rights Reserved.
    • Privacy
    • Terms
    • Press Release
    • Advertise
    • Contact

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    invesloan.com
    Manage Cookie Consent
    To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    • Manage options
    • Manage services
    • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
    • Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    • {title}
    • {title}
    • {title}